Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
The Effect of Variable-Pitch Headless Compression Screws and Cortical Screws on Interfragmentary Compression: An In
Brendan R Castellino1, Daniel J Wills2, Christopher J Tan1,3
1Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia.
Abstract:
Articular fractures require precise anatomical reduction and rigid fixation to heal appropriately. In veterinary cases that involve fracturing of the lateral humeral condyle, cortical bone screws inserted in lag fashion with Kirschner wire are the preferred method for surgical fixation. However, relatively high complication rates associated with cortical lag screws (CLSs) highlights the need to investigate alternate screw designs. Variable-pitch headless compression screws (VPHCSs) are unique as they advance beneath the cortical surface. Although the use of VPHCSs are widely utilised in human orthopaedics, the current use in veterinary orthopaedics is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the peak interfragmentary force (PIF) and area of compression (AOC) generated by a 3.5 mm self-tapping cortical screw placed in lag fashion and a 3.5 mm VPHCS inserted to four depths. PIF and AOC were measured using a pressure-sensitive film placed between two blocks of polyurethane foam (0.24 g/cm3), simulating a transverse fracture. CLSs were inserted by hand into predrilled 2.5 mm pilot holes. PIF and AOC were measured at full insertion. VPHCSs were placed into predrilled 2.5 mm pilot holes, followed by a 3.5 mm tapered countersink. The screw was inserted until the head was level with the surface. PIF and AOC were measured between the two blocks. The screw was continued until the head was at a depth of 2, 5, and 9 mm below the surface, and the PIF and AOC were measured again at each stage. There was no detectable difference in PIF and AOC between CLSs and VPHCSs countersunk to -2 mm (PIF-CLS: Mean = 12.886, SD = 2.370; 2 mm: Mean = 17.301, SD = 8.858, p = 0.319; AOC-CLS: Mean = 0.936, SD = 0.291; 2 mm: Mean = 0.925, SD = 0.447, p = 0.872). VPHCSs countersunk to -5 mm and -9 mm produced significantly greater PIF compared to CLSs (5 mm: Mean = 16.086, SD = 6.799, p = 0.002; 9 mm: Mean = 34.987, SD = 4.015, p < 0.001). VPHCSs countersunk to -5 and -9 mm produced significantly greater PIF and AOC compared to CLSs in this model. Further investigation is required to produce recommendations for clinical use.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Frictional Forces on Screws
A jack with a square-threaded screw is a mechanical device used to lift heavy loads by applying a force at its handle. When the force is applied, the screw turns, raising the load. The screw can...
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Impact Strength of Concrete
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
