Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

12:19
Multi-Scale Modification of Metallic Implants With Pore Gradients, Polyelectrolytes and Their Indirect Monitoring In vivo
Published on: July 1, 2013
11.3K
Biomarker-Guided Implant Maintenance (BGIM): A Narrative Review and Protocol Proposal
Tiziano Testori1,2,3,4, Richard Lazzara5, Renzo Guarnieri6,7,8
1Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|April 14, 2026
Summary
Peri-implant disease, a complication of dental implants, can be managed with a new protocol. This Biomarker-Guided Implant Maintenance (BGIM) protocol uses active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) levels to personalize patient care and prevent complications.
Area of Science:
- Dental Medicine
- Biomaterials Science
- Periodontology
Background:
- Dental implants are a predictable treatment for missing teeth, but complications like peri-implant disease can occur.
- Peri-implant disease involves bone loss and inflammation, negatively impacting patient quality of life.
- Understanding the etiology, epidemiology, and pathogenesis of peri-implant disease is crucial for effective management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current knowledge on peri-implant disease, focusing on its causes, prevalence, and risk factors.
- To evaluate the diagnostic potential of active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) in peri-implant sulcular fluid.
- To propose a novel protocol for individualized implant maintenance scheduling.
Main Methods:
- A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus databases for studies on peri-implantitis and biomarkers.
- Included were clinical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and consensus papers published up to June 2025.
- A new protocol, Biomarker-Guided Implant Maintenance (BGIM), was developed based on key risk factors and aMMP-8 levels.
Main Results:
- Active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) shows diagnostic potential for assessing peri-implant tissue status.
- The BGIM protocol categorizes patients into risk levels for peri-implantitis.
- Higher risk levels correlate with a need for more frequent professional maintenance.
Conclusions:
- The BGIM protocol offers a structured, clinically applicable framework for personalized implant maintenance.
- Integrating aMMP-8 quantification with patient risk factors can optimize implant care.
- Prospective validation is required, but the BGIM protocol may enhance implant longevity by preventing peri-implant disease.

