Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Types of Resin Composite and Filling Techniques: How They Affect Internal Void Volume and Compressive Strength
Pirat Karntiang1, Chitpol Chaimanakarn2, Daranee Chaimanakarn1
1Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani 12000, Thailand.
The multilayer filling technique for dental restorations creates more internal voids than single-layer techniques. However, these voids may not significantly impact the final compressive strength of the resin composite restoration.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Dental restorations require precise material placement to ensure longevity and prevent secondary caries.
- Internal voids within resin composite restorations can compromise mechanical properties and clinical performance.
- Evaluating void formation and its impact on strength is crucial for optimizing restorative techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the void volume percentage and compressive strength of dental restorations fabricated using different resin composite materials and placement techniques.
- To investigate the influence of single-layer versus multilayer incremental techniques on void formation.
- To assess the relationship between void content and the mechanical integrity of the final restoration.
Main Methods:
- Five experimental groups were established using Filtek™ Z350XT and Filtek™ One Bulk Fill resin composites with varying placement strategies (single layer, horizontal, oblique increments).
- Specimens were prepared to specific dimensions (4 mm height, 5 mm diameter) and analyzed for internal void volume using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).
- Compressive strength testing was performed on all specimens, with data analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests.
Main Results:
- The bulk fill and flowable composite combination (BF) exhibited the highest void volume percentage (0.5501 ± 0.2031%).
- Single-layer techniques (ZS and BS) demonstrated the lowest void percentages (0.0366 ± 0.0279% and 0.1991 ± 0.1463%, respectively).
- Restorations using Filtek™ Z350XT with single (ZS) and horizontal (ZH) increments showed significantly higher compressive strength (200.18 ± 16.32 MPa and 192.18 ± 17.23 MPa) compared to BS and BF groups.
Conclusions:
- Multilayer incremental filling techniques result in significantly higher internal void percentages compared to single-layer placement.
- Certain resin composite materials may inherently contain voids, irrespective of the placement technique.
- Despite increased void formation with multilayer techniques, these voids do not appear to directly compromise the compressive strength of the evaluated dental restorations.
More Related Videos
09:41Magnet Assisted Composite Manufacturing: A Flexible New Technique for Achieving High Consolidation Pressure in Vacuum Bag/Lay-Up Processes
Published on: May 17, 2018
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Total Voids in Concrete
Composite Masonry Walls
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...
Masonry Cavity Walls
Maintaining a clean cavity during construction...