Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 15, 2026

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis
Published on: July 8, 2025
Is Routine Double-J Stenting Necessary in Pediatric Pyeloplasty?
Sebastian G Tobia González1, Anna Bujons Tur2, Tiago Rosito3
1Urology, Driscoll Children's Hospital, Corpus Christi, USA.
Insights
Routine double-J (DJ) ureteral stent use in pediatric pyeloplasty does not reduce postoperative complications. This multicenter study found comparable outcomes with or without DJ stents, suggesting selective placement may be more appropriate.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Pediatric Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- The necessity of routine double-J (DJ) ureteral stents in pediatric pyeloplasty, especially in open surgery, is debated.
- While common in minimally invasive techniques, their impact on postoperative complications requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the influence of routine DJ stent use on postoperative complication rates in pediatric pyeloplasty.
- To compare outcomes between stented and non-stented pediatric pyeloplasty cases across multiple institutions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of a multicenter international database of pediatric pyeloplasty cases (open, laparoscopic, robotic).
- Patients were categorized based on DJ stent utilization (presence or absence).
- Primary outcome: overall postoperative complication rate; Secondary outcomes: UTI, reoperation, length of stay.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in complication rates between stented (26.7%) and non-stented (20.4%) groups (p=0.39).
- Reoperation rates (3.7% vs 4.5%, p=0.81) and rates of UTI and length of stay were also comparable.
- Outcomes were consistent across different surgical approaches and stenting strategies.
Conclusions:
- Routine use of DJ stents does not appear to decrease postoperative complications in pediatric pyeloplasty.
- Comparable outcomes suggest that routine DJ placement may be unnecessary for most open pyeloplasty procedures.
- A selective stenting strategy, rather than universal use, is supported by these findings.
Abstract:
Background The role of routine internal drainage with a double-J (DJ) ureteral stent in pediatric pyeloplasty remains controversial. While stents are frequently used in minimally invasive approaches, their necessity in open surgery is debated, particularly regarding their impact on postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate whether the routine use of DJ stents influences postoperative complication rates in pediatric pyeloplasty within a multicenter international collaborative cohort. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of a pooled multicenter database including pediatric patients undergoing pyeloplasty (open, laparoscopic, and robotic) across four international institutions. Patients were categorized according to DJ stent use. The primary outcome was the overall postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcomes included urinary tract infection (UTI), reoperation, and length of hospital stay. Laparoscopic and robotic cases, in which DJ stents were routinely used, served as contemporary reference controls. Comparative analyses were performed between stented and non-stented cases, with statistical significance defined as a p-value <0.05. Results A total of 231 pediatric pyeloplasty cases with complete documentation regarding DJ stent utilization (presence or absence) were included in the comparative analysis. Open pyeloplasty cases were performed with or without DJ stenting, while minimally invasive approaches predominantly included routine stenting. Complication rates were 26.7% in the stented group and 20.4% in the non-stented group (p = 0.39). Reoperation rates were 3.7% and 4.5%, respectively (p = 0.81). No statistically significant differences were observed in rates of UTI, reoperation, or length of stay. Outcomes remained consistent across surgical approaches and stent utilization strategies. Conclusions Routine use of a DJ stent does not reduce postoperative complications in pediatric pyeloplasty. In this multicenter cohort, comparable outcomes were observed with and without internal drainage. These findings suggest that routine DJ placement is likely unnecessary in most open pyeloplasty cases and support a selective rather than universal stenting strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

