Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

13:52
Coupled Assays for Monitoring Protein Refolding in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Published on: July 9, 2013
10.9K
Quantifying Population Reversibility of Sensor Performance in Multi-Cycle Single-Sensor Recovery Assay
Geffen Rosenberg1, Gili Bisker1,2,3,4,5,6
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Small (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany)
|April 14, 2026
Summary
This study developed a workflow to assess individual nanosensor performance over multiple uses. It reveals significant variability in sensor response and recovery, crucial for accurate chemical imaging.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Materials Science
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Quantitative chemical imaging demands sensors with reliable recovery across repeated exposures.
- Single-sensor imaging offers spatiotemporal resolution for biological processes, but requires analysis of sensor variability for calibration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a generic workflow for characterizing individual nanosensor response, recovery, and reversibility under multi-cycle challenges.
- To assess sensor variability in quantitative chemical imaging applications.
Main Methods:
- An automated microfluidic flow imaging platform was combined with systematic characterization of individual nanosensors.
- Three near-infrared fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) sensor models targeting dopamine, thiocholine, and serotonin were tested.
- A Population Reversibility Score based on Kullback-Leibler Divergence was introduced to quantify performance across cycles.
Main Results:
- Single-sensor analysis revealed broad heterogeneity in response magnitude, signal recovery, and reversibility across hundreds of SWCNTs.
- While first-cycle ensemble averages matched bulk calibration, individual sensor behavior varied significantly under repeated exposure and wash cycles.
- The Population Reversibility Score provided a quantitative metric for cycle- and concentration-dependent performance.
Conclusions:
- Nanosensor variability is a critical factor in quantitative chemical imaging that is often masked by ensemble averaging.
- The developed workflow and Population Reversibility Score enable detailed analysis of sensor performance, guiding optimization for spatiotemporal analyte mapping.
- This framework is applicable to various sensor-analyte systems with transient readouts.

