[Exercise capacity and physical activity following prosthetic valve replacement in relation to cardiovascular...

31 patients (Pt) with Mitral Valve Repacement (MVR), 22 Pt with Aortic VR (AVR) and 10 Pt with Double VR (DVR) are investigated hemodynamically and by ergometry. Normal working capacity (100% WC) has been achieved in 59% of Pt with AVR, in 34% with MVR and in 22% with DVR. Pulmonary artery mean pressure (PAMP) in this group was 19.5 mmHg, in a second group with a WC of 80% PAMP was 22.2 mmHG. 77% OF Pt with AVR are working regularly, in MVR 58% and in DVR 50%. In the average of these Pt, 7 months after VR professional occupation is started again. PAMP and pulmonary vascular resistance (APR) is significantly lower in the working vs. the non working group: PAMP 19.8/23.7 mmHg; APR 115/145 dynes sec cm-5, respectively. In MVR, the transprosthetic pressure gradient at rest was 4.1 (working PPT) and 7.5 mmHg (other); in AVR statistically no significant difference in the gradient could be found. In general, 68% of the working Pt are employed in a preferably sedentary job. The mean duration of daily work was estimated to 6.7 hours. It is concluded that AVR yields more favourable results in terms of regaining normal working activity than MVR. Cardiovascular function and physical capability in Pt with DVR are approximately comparable to MVR.