Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
Published on: May 10, 2012
A comprehensive, open-source battery of movement imagery ability tests: Development and psychometric properties
Marcos Moreno-Verdú1, Baptiste M Waltzing2, Elise E Van Caenegem2
1Brain, Action, and Skill Laboratory (BAS-Lab), Institute of Neuroscience (Cognition and Systems Division), UCLouvain, Av. Mounier 54, +2, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium. marcos.morenoverdu@uclouvain.be.
None:
Imagining performing a movement without executing it (movement imagery) is a covert and multidimensional skill. Leading models propose that the sub-processes of imagery generation, maintenance and manipulation are critical to movement imagery. However, measuring these individual processes, and the potential relationships between them, remains challenging. Here we developed and validated a combination of online tests to assess these different processes. A total of 180 healthy individuals completed the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised, Second Edition (MIQ-RS; generation), the Imagined Finger Sequence Task (iFST; maintenance) and the Hand Laterality Judgement Task (HLJT; manipulation). MIQ-RS showed a bifactorial structure (visual and kinaesthetic modalities) according to confirmatory factor analysis, with good internal consistency. In the iFST, internal validity analyses showed a clear effect of sequence complexity, in both execution and imagery. Reliability, estimated via signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), was also adequate (SNR ≥ 1.6). In the HLJT, expected effects of rotation angle, hand view and their interaction were found, consistent with biomechanical constraints. Reliability was also adequate (SNR ≥ 1.75). Test-retest reliability (123 participants reassessed after 6-8 days) was generally adequate (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ≥ 0.67). Notably, criterion validity across tests, assessed using Bayesian Spearman's correlations, showed that correlations were generally absent (BF01 ≥ 3) or of small magnitude (r ≤ 0.27). We conclude that the online versions of these tests showed adequate structural/internal validity and (test-retest) reliability. Importantly, weak criterion validity across tests suggests that the differing sub-processes underlying movement imagery are largely dissociable, underscoring the need for comprehensive, multidimensional assessment of movement imagery ability.

