Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implementation of BIVA for Analyzing Disease Risk Factors in Patients with Low Body Cell Mass
Published on: July 14, 2023
Diagnostic Accuracy of Arm Conicity to Detect Inaccurate Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement in Obese Patients
Victoria Eley1,2, Anita Pelecanos3, George Hopkins2,4
1Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract:
Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurement can be challenging in patients with obesity. We aimed to determine if arm conicity, mid arm circumference or body mass index (BMI) could be used to predict pre-operative and intra-operative NIBP measurement error. Eligible patients had elective surgery and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Mid-arm circumference and arm slant angle (a measure of arm conicity) were measured according to standardised methods. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were obtained using invasive (INV) and non-invasive methods at pre-induction (T0) and 20 min post-induction. NIBP accuracy was defined as ≤ 10 mmHg difference from invasive measurement. Post hoc analyses evaluated under and over-estimation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated. The 141 participants had a mean (SD) BMI of 46.9 (8.9) kg/m2. There were 531 measurements at T0 and T20 with INV and NIBP available. Of 265 for SBP, 150 (56.7%) were inaccurate and of 266 for DBP, 113 (42.5%) were inaccurate. All ROC curves for right arm slant angle, right mid-arm circumference and BMI for SBP and DBP at T0 and T20 approached a 45° line. Area under ROC curves (AUROCs) ranged from 0.47 (0.36, 0.57) to 0.64 (0.54, 0.74), suggesting poor diagnostic performance. The best performer was right arm slant angle, with AUROCs 0.63 (0.51, 0.75) for DBP and 0.69 (0.59, 0.78) for SBP for underestimation at T0. Inaccurate measurements were common. Right arm conicity, mid-arm circumference and BMI were poor classifiers of NIBP measurement error at the pre-induction and intraoperative time points. EDITORIAL COMMENT: Accuracy of NIBP measurements in obese patients is uncertain. This clinical study compared routine oscillometric clinical blood pressure methods to a reference invasive blood pressure measure in an obese cohort. Significant disagreement between these is described, demonstrating reliability problems for some of the common arm oscillometric cuff implementations.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement