Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 16, 2026

06:46
Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
7.6K
Top-down motivation both decreases and increases feature interference following a saccade
Tzu-Yao Chiu1, Julie D Golomb2
1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. chiu.315@osu.edu.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 15, 2026
Summary
Motivation impacts dynamic spatial attention. Higher rewards reduced some visual errors after eye movements (saccades), but increased others, suggesting distinct attentional mechanisms are affected differently by top-down control.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
- Attention Studies
Background:
- Spatial attention is dynamic, not static, in real-world scenarios.
- Shifts in attention and eye movements (saccades) can cause feature-binding errors in perception.
- It remains unclear if these errors are controllable via top-down motivation or are automatic byproducts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether top-down control, induced by performance-contingent rewards, can mitigate feature-binding errors following saccades.
- To determine if feature interference reflects a flexible response to motivation or an automatic consequence of attentional remapping.
Main Methods:
- A preregistered experiment with 40 healthy adults reporting item color at cued locations.
- Participants performed a saccade followed by a brief visual array presentation.
- Monetary incentives were varied across blocks to manipulate top-down motivation levels.
Main Results:
- Higher rewards improved overall performance and reduced retinotopic mixing errors post-saccade.
- Conversely, increased motivation led to more retinotopic swapping errors early after saccades.
- This suggests distinct effects of motivation on different attentional remapping subprocesses.
Conclusions:
- Motivation differentially affects distinct attentional mechanisms involved in spatial remapping across saccades.
- Retinotopic swapping errors may stem from structural limitations in attentional remapping.
- Findings offer novel insights into top-down control in dynamic spatial attention and visual perception.
Related Concept Videos
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
1.4K
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
The theory differentiates between...
1.4K
Motivational Bias
486
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
486

