Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surgery for wrist osteoarthritis.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Heterogeneity in Clinical Outcomes Reporting in Minimally-Invasive Facial Rejuvenation: Is It Time for a Core Outcomes Set?

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Deferoxamine Improves Radiation-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Journal of cellular and molecular medicine·2026
Same author

[A Consensus Statement of the German-Speaking Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery (GSRM): Closure of the DIEP/ms-TRAM Flap Donor-Site Defect].

Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...·2026
Same author

Why Less Is More: The Value of Living a Minimalist Lifestyle.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Hybrid Lipid Nanoparticles Containing Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Doxorubicin.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026
Same journal

Error in Byline.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Error in Abstract.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

One Step Closer to Real-Time Detection of Missed Opportunities for Diagnosis in the ED Using LLMs.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Procalcitonin-An Enigmatic Anxiolytic Biomarker.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Terminated, Withdrawn, or Suspended Suicide Prevention Studies.

JAMA network open·2026
Same journal

Life's Essential 8 in Pregnancy and Time to Incident Cardiometabolic Disease Over 7 Years Follow-Up.

JAMA network open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

874

Machine Learning Model to Predict Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Complications.

Mohammed S Shaheen1,2, Brennen T McManus1, Clara M Cullen1,3

  • 1Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

JAMA Network Open
|April 15, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models can predict major complications after postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) using patient data. This aids in personalized risk assessment and shared decision-making for improved patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 16, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

874
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • Postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) significantly enhances patient quality of life.
  • Patients often lack precise, individualized information regarding complication risks associated with PMBR.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers a powerful approach to analyze complex clinical data for personalized risk prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate ML models for predicting major complications following PMBR.
  • To utilize both structured electronic health record data and unstructured clinical notes for model training.
  • To enhance shared decision-making by providing individualized complication risk estimates.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective prognostic study involving 411 female patients undergoing PMBR at two US academic centers (2012-2022).
  • Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and random forest models were trained on 80% of data and tested on 20%.
  • Major complications were defined as unplanned reoperations or rehospitalizations within one year; model performance was assessed using AUROC and AUPRC.

Main Results:

  • The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance (AUROC 0.83, AUPRC 0.62) compared to the random forest model (AUROC 0.74, AUPRC 0.56).
  • Key predictors for major complications included smoking, adjuvant radiotherapy, BMI, age, and diabetes.
  • The overall major complication rate was 25.8%, with consistent model performance across different reconstruction types.

Conclusions:

  • An internally validated ML model effectively predicts 1-year major complications after PMBR using diverse clinical data.
  • These models are crucial for personalized risk assessment and informing patient-clinician decision-making.
  • The study provides a foundation for developing prospective, externally validated decision-support tools for PMBR.