Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

Production, Characterization and Potential Uses of a 3D Tissue-engineered Human Esophageal Mucosal Model
Published on: May 18, 2015
Lifestyle and Environmental Risk Factors for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Evidence From the Johannesburg
Wenlong Carl Chen1,2,3,4, Debbie Bradshaw5, Thendo Ramaliba6
1Division of the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Cancer Registry, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Purpose:
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains a major cause of cancer mortality in South Africa. Understanding locally relevant and modifiable risk factors is crucial for prevention. This study clarifies the syndemic role of lifestyle and environmental factors, such as alcohol, tobacco, socioeconomic indicators (rurality and education), and fuel use, in ESCC.
Methods:
We analyzed 939 histologically confirmed ESCC cases and 3,089 cancer controls from the Johannesburg Cancer Study. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs), with interaction terms for alcohol, tobacco, and sex. Population attributable fractions were calculated using both study-control and national prevalence estimates.
Results:
Very high alcohol intake (≥840 g ethanol/wk) showed a modest independent association with ESCC (aOR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.14 to 2.12]). Smoking was a strong risk factor, with aOR = 2.82 (95% CI, 2.20 to 3.62) for ex-smokers and 6.71 (95% CI, 5.15 to 8.76) for current smokers. Among never-smokers, alcohol showed little dose response. Among smokers, risks were high across all alcohol levels, with no consistent increase at higher intakes. Additional risks included rural origin or residence (aOR approximately equal to 1.22-2.38), lower educational attainment (aOR approximately equal to 1.45-1.69), and use of biomass or other fuels (aOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.87]).
Conclusion:
In this high-burden setting, tobacco remains the principal modifiable driver of ESCC. Alcohol showed only a modest independent effect, limited to very high intake, and did not increase the risk among smokers beyond the high risk from smoking. Socioeconomic and environmental disadvantages cluster with behavioral risks, underscoring a syndemic context. These findings, consistent with prior Johannesburg Cancer Study reports yet offering greater exposure granularity, support targeted prevention strategies focused on smoking cessation, mitigation of hazardous drinking patterns, and reduction of household environmental exposures.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more similar...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Lifestyle Factors and Health
Benefits of Physical Activity
Physical activity, whether through structured exercise or casual activities like walking, biking, or dancing, is a cornerstone of a...

