Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Hospital-Wide Quality Assessment Using All-Condition Versus Summed-Condition Risk Adjustment
Valérie Gopinath1, Kelsey Chalmers1, Vikas Saini1
1Lown Institute, Needham, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective:
To compare risk-adjusted 30-day mortality using two hospital-wide methods: one across all admissions ("all-condition") versus a model with combined results from 15 condition/procedure cohorts ("summed-condition").
Study Setting And Design:
We developed models on 2019 and 2020 (validated prospectively on 2020 and 2021) using Medicare admissions for patients aged 65 to 94 years. We measured hospitals' 30-day risk standardized mortality rate (RSMR) using both approaches, as well as two covariate selection methods: Risk Stratification Index (RSI) and Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC). We reported model performance statistics, descriptive statistics comparing hospitals' RSMR between methods, and an exploration of hospital characteristics associated with different RSMR estimates from the two approaches using random forest regression.
Data Sources And Analytic Sample:
100% sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims. We included 3638 general US hospitals with a secondary analysis on 1355 large hospitals.
Principal Findings:
There was high correlation between RSMRs from all- and summed-condition methods (0.89 correlation using RSI; 0.87 HCC). RSMR correlation between RSI and HCC was higher when using the all-condition versus summed-condition method (0.87 vs. 0.85). Model performance was higher using RSI (C-statistic 0.88 for all-condition; 0.84 to 0.95 summed-condition) than for HCC (C-statistic 0.87 for all-condition; 0.80 to 0.93 summed-condition). Small hospitals and those with a high proportion of non-surgical pulmonary admissions had lower estimated RSMRs under the summed-condition method compared to all-condition. For large hospitals, all- and summed-condition RSMRs were highly correlated using either RSI or HCC (correlation 0.97 RSI; 0.95 HCC).
Conclusions:
All- and summed-condition RSMRs using RSI were highly correlated. Some hospital characteristics were associated with comparative RSMR results between all- versus summed-condition. For large hospitals, the choice of RSI versus HCC impacts RSMR more than the choice of all- versus summed-condition method.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

