Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Machine Learning Prediction for Fe(II) Spin-Crossover Complex in the Same Spin State Using Geometrical and
Natsumi Okawa1, Tomoyuki Miyao1,2
1Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
None:
Spin-crossover (SCO) complexes are molecular materials capable of reversibly switching between high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states in response to external stimuli. Predicting SCO from crystallographic data allows for the efficient design of new SCO complexes. However, no extensive and diverse data sets of complexes with annotated SCO characteristics were available. In the present study, we manually assembled a data set of 500 Fe(II)-N6 coordination complexes with explicit spin states and SCO potential, termed FeN6-SSD. Using this data set, we built machine learning models to distinguish between SCO-undergoing and non-SCO complexes crystallized in the same spin state (either HS or LS). The classification results showed that the key factors for predicting SCO activity differed between the two spin states: in the HS regime, local geometric distortions, such as Fe-N bond elongation and octahedral deformation, were important, whereas in the LS regime, ligand-derived chemical and steric factors were important. Overall, the many-body tensor representation as a descriptor set achieved high prediction accuracy in both spin states. The influence of environmental factors, such as solvents and counterions, on SCO classification was inconsistent across representations.
More Related Videos
11:19Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
Published on: July 4, 2016
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Valence Bond Theory
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...