Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

A Data Integration Workflow to Identify Drug Combinations Targeting Synthetic Lethal Interactions
Published on: May 27, 2021
Economic Evaluation of Inavolisib Combined With Palbociclib-Fulvestrant for PIK3CA-Mutated, HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast
Hanqing Zeng1, Li-Ying Song1, Ren Guo1
1Department of Pharmacy, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Abstract:
ObjectiveInavolisib, a novel highly selective PI3Kα inhibitor, is approved for treating PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC). Given its significant efficacy, as confirmed by the updated INAVO120 III trial, but also its high price, a comprehensive evaluation of its value is warranted. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant is cost-effective for patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC from the U.S. healthcare system perspective.MethodsA Markov model comprising three health states was developed to simulate the progression of PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC. Parametric survival models, fitted to and extrapolated from survival data, were used to estimate long-term clinical outcomes. Lifetime costs and health outcomes were calculated. Willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at $100,000, $150,000, and $200,000 per quality-adjusted life year QALY to reflect general and more affluent regional standards. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess model robustness, and subgroup analyses explored the variation in benefits across patient clinical characteristics.ResultsCompared with placebo, inavolisib provided an additional 0.6 QALYs while increasing costs by $160,490.07, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $268,457.82 per QALY. Sensitivity analysis identified the utility of the progression-free state as the most sensitive factor in the model. Within the WTP threshold range of $100,000 to $200,000 per QALY, the inavolisib regimen was not considered cost-effective. To achieve cost-effectiveness at WTP thresholds of $100,000, $150,000, and $200,000 per QALY, the per-cycle price of inavolisib would need to be reduced to 59.5%, 72.0%, and 86.5% of its current price, respectively.ConclusionFor patients with PIK3CA-mutated HR+/HER2- ABC, the inavolisib regimen is not cost-effective in the U.S. healthcare setting. Negotiating price reductions and adjusting decision thresholds based on patient characteristics may be viable strategies to meet the extensive treatment demand in the U.S.
Insights
The inavolisib regimen for PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer is not cost-effective in the U.S. Significant price reductions are needed for this PI3Kα inhibitor to meet willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Inavolisib is a selective PI3Kα inhibitor approved for PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC).
- The INAVO120 III trial confirmed its efficacy, but its high cost necessitates a value assessment.
- Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant is crucial for U.S. healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC.
- To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from a U.S. healthcare system perspective.
- To identify necessary price reductions for the regimen to be considered cost-effective.
Main Methods:
- A three-state Markov model simulated disease progression in PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC patients.
- Parametric survival models extrapolated long-term clinical outcomes, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
- Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses assessed model robustness and benefit variations.
Main Results:
- The inavolisib regimen yielded an additional 0.6 QALYs at an increased cost of $160,490.07, resulting in an ICER of $268,457.82 per QALY.
- The regimen was not cost-effective within willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of $100,000-$200,000 per QALY.
- Inavolisib's price would need to decrease to 59.5%-86.5% of its current cost to meet WTP thresholds.
Conclusions:
- The inavolisib regimen is not cost-effective for PIK3CA-mutated, HR+/HER2- ABC in the U.S. healthcare setting.
- Price reductions for inavolisib are essential to improve its cost-effectiveness.
- Adjusting decision thresholds based on patient characteristics could address treatment demand.
More Related Videos
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
14:34A Bilingual Computational Workflow for Identifying Potential PLK1 Inhibitors in American Sign Language and English
Published on: April 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...