Interrogating cognitive and neural group variation in childhood: Examples in adolescent brain cognitive development
Sarah L Karalunas1, Gowtham Atluri2, Leanne Tamm3
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.
Abstract:
Multiple large-scale efforts are underway that share a goal of revising psychological diagnostic nosology to better align with mechanistic features, including cognitive and neural development. Latent grouping approaches may be helpful. However, to date, evidence for replicable and clinically useful cognitive or neuroimaging-based subgroups is weak. Here, we apply common clustering approaches (k-means and latent profile analysis) to (a) cognitive features, including measures of executive functioning and computational reaction time parameters, and (b) structural brain imaging features in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development cohort. Using a randomization approach for determining optimal group number and testing within-sample replication, we seek to identify a reproducible grouping structure. To address questions of generalizability to a clinical population, we next determine whether groups can be reproduced in a second, independent sample (Oregon Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-1000) with more than 50% of children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Finally, we test both concurrent and predictive clinical validity. Results demonstrated that computational reaction time parameters can yield reproducible groups in both population-based and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder clinical samples with at least some evidence for clinical validity. Diffusion tensor imaging-measured fractional anisotropy features yielded the strongest evidence of reproducible groups among structural neuroimaging features, although generalizability and clinical validation were not as strong. Overall, clustering approaches offer an important way to leverage rich, high-dimensional data sets. Computational cognitive parameters and diffusion tensor imaging-measured fractional anisotropy may be an appropriate focus of future studies, and similar methods could be applied to other feature sets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
07:15Author Spotlight: Understanding Adolescent Social Adversity Effects on Neurodevelopment in Mice
Published on: March 15, 2024
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Information Processing Approach
Cognitive Development During Adulthood
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Three Developmental Domains
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and weight,...
