Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Measuring the Motor Aspect of Cancer-Related Fatigue using a Handheld Dynamometer
Published on: February 20, 2020
Evaluation of the construct validity of the Michigan Fatigability Index (MIFI) short forms: a cross-sectional survey
Anna Kratz1, Noelle Carlozzi2, Susan Murphy2
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, USA. alkratz@umich.edu.
Background:
The Michigan Fatigability Index (MIFI) is a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure that was developed in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) or fibromyalgia (FM). The MIFI consists of three items banks and corresponding 6-item short forms that assess physical fatigability, mental fatigability, or emotional fatigability. This report details examination of convergent and known-groups validity (i.e., construct validity) of the MIFI short forms for MS and FM.
Methodology:
A US web-based cross-sectional survey was distributed to n = 2650 participants (FM n = 1242; MS n = 1408) who completed the MIFI measure and measures of fatigue intensity, severity, impact, fatigability, physical and cognitive functioning, anxiety, and depressive symptoms to establish convergent validity. Tests of known groups validity were based on disease severity scores for MS and FM and PROMIS measures of global physical and mental health scores, which were dichotomized into upper and lower tertile health groups.
Results:
Convergent validity of the MIFI short forms was supported by moderate to high correlations (r = > 0.60) with measures of similar constructs. Each MIFI fatigability short form was able to distinguish between lower and upper tertiles on global physical and mental health with large effects (η²>0.3), and between lower and upper disease severity subgroups with small to large effects, supporting known groups validity.
Conclusions:
Results support the construct validity of the MIFI physical fatigability, mental fatigability, and emotional fatigability short forms for MS and FM. The MIFI measures, which are brief and developed specifically for use in clinical populations with high fatigue burden, should be considered for use in clinical and research applications.
Related Concept Videos
Fatigue
Fatigue Strength of Concrete
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as...

