Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Fabricating van der Waals Heterostructures with Precise Rotational Alignment
Published on: July 5, 2019
Device-scaling constraints imposed by the van der Waals gap formed in two-dimensional materials
Mahdi Pourfath1, Tibor Grasser1
1Institute for Microelectronics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
None:
Transistor miniaturization requires controlling gate leakage through ultrathin dielectrics and minimizing source-drain contact resistance. Although two-dimensional semiconductors offer excellent electrostatic control, their interfaces with gate dielectrics and contact metals often form a van der Waals (vdW) gap that affects device performance and acts as a tunneling barrier with a low dielectric constant. While this reduces dielectric leakage, it increases metal-channel contact resistance and introduces a parasitic series capacitance to the gate. We quantified the trade-off between leakage suppression and electrostatic and contact-resistance scaling limits. As a result of this trade-off, many insulators fail to meet scaling targets, and metal-channel contacts fall short of required resistances. Zipper-like interfaces, where quasi-covalent bonding removes the vdW gap without creating dangling bonds, offer a path toward ultrascaled transistor designs.
Related Concept Videos
Van der Waals Interactions
The Van der Waals Equation
Van der Waals Equation
First, the attractive forces between molecules, which are stronger at higher densities and reduce the pressure, are considered by adding to the pressure a term equal to the square of the molar density multiplied by a positive coefficient a. Second, the...
Real Gases: Effects of Intermolecular Forces and Molecular Volume Deriving Van der Waals Equation
Band Theory
The energy difference between these bands is known as the band gap.
Conductor, Semiconductor,...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than...

