Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determining the age cut-off for increased surgical risk after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly patients: MBSAQIP 2015-2023 database analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Comparison of one anastomosis gastric bypass to standard bariatric interventions: a propensity score matching analysis using the 2020-2023 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery·2026
Same author

Heart failure as a leading independent predictor for mortality and adverse outcomes after bariatric surgery: analysis using the 2023-2024 MBSAQIP database.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery·2026
Same author

Preoperative Hypoalbuminemia is Associated With an Increased Risk of Mortality in Patients With BMI ≥50 Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using the 2015-2022 MBSAQIP Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

Investigating the utility of EndoFLIPâ„¢ as a screening tool for pathologic reflux EndoFLIPâ„¢ as a screening tool for GERD.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Clinician's Guide to Artificial Intelligence: Technical Foundations of Machine Learning.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Complete Response of Merkel Cell Carcinoma to Immunotherapy and Single-Fraction Radiotherapy Following Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Immune Mechanism.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Perioperative Acute Myocardial Infarction in Non-Cardiac Operations: A National Analysis.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Outcomes of Completion Cholecystectomy: Association With Patient Comorbidity in a National Database.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Building the Conversation: Editorial Stewardship in Contemporary Surgical Publishing.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal Pain in Surgeons on Operating Days.

The American surgeon·2026
Same journal

Splenectomy During Cytoreductive Surgery: Marker of Surgical Burden or Independent Predictor of Morbidity?

The American surgeon·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.5K

Do Surgical Trainees Impact Surgeon Robotic Learning Curves?

Siena Mirasol1, Alba Zevallos1, Zachary Tran1,2

  • 1Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

The American Surgeon
|April 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Robotic surgery learning curves vary significantly between surgeons, irrespective of trainee involvement or formal training programs. Surgeon-specific factors are key determinants in mastering robotic-assisted cholecystectomies.

Keywords:
cholecystectomylearning curverobotic surgerysurgical education

More Related Videos

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

833
Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

20.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

10.5K
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
08:21

Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve

Published on: August 15, 2025

833
Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators
09:51

Model Surgical Training: Skills Acquisition in Fetoscopic Laser Photocoagulation of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Placenta Using Realistic Simulators

Published on: March 21, 2018

20.7K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Education
  • Medical Technology Assessment

Background:

  • Inter-surgeon variability in robotic surgery learning curves is poorly understood.
  • The impact of trainee involvement and formal training curricula on these curves is unclear.
  • Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis is a validated tool for assessing surgical learning curves.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To utilize CUSUM analysis to evaluate learning curves in robotic-assisted cholecystectomies.
  • To investigate the influence of surgical trainees on operative times and learning phases.
  • To assess the effect of a formal robotic surgery training curriculum on learning curve trajectories.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 707 robotic-assisted cholecystectomies performed by 7 surgeons (2012-2022).
  • CUSUM analysis applied to operative time to generate learning curves for each surgeon.
  • Trainee involvement analyzed by postgraduate year; curriculum implementation in 2016.

Main Results:

  • Five of seven surgeons showed a distinct learning phase (20-59 cases); two had baseline proficiency.
  • High trainee participation (94.5%) and consistent seniority distribution did not reduce learning curve variability.
  • Implementation of a robotic surgery curriculum did not significantly alter individual surgeon learning curve trajectories.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy learning curves are highly surgeon-specific.
  • Trainee involvement and formal training curricula did not demonstrably impact the identified learning curve variability or trajectories.
  • Further research is needed to understand and mitigate inter-surgeon variability in robotic surgery proficiency.