Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023
Different aflibercept regimens for wet age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and network
Yu-Sheng Chen1,2, Hua-Ching Chang3,4,5,6, Sheng-Chu Chi2,7
1Department of Ophthalmology, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Background:
Intravitreal aflibercept injection for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was initially approved with a regimen consisting of three monthly loading doses followed by maintenance doses every 8 weeks. Alternative regimens with a reduced treatment burden have been explored. The treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen involves gradually extending the treatment interval in accordance with disease activity, and the pro-re-nata (PRN) regimen involves administering injections only when signs of disease activity are observed during follow-up visits. This study evaluated these alternative regimens aimed at reducing treatment burden in real-world clinical practice.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effects model was adopted for network meta-analysis. Results are presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.
Results:
Seven RCTs (1683 patients with wet AMD) were included in the network meta-analysis. No significant inter-regimen differences were observed in visual acuity or central retinal thickness. The TAE and PRN regimens required significantly fewer injections than did bimonthly and monthly regimens, respectively (TAE vs bimonthly: SMD -1.091, 95% CI -2.030 to -0.153; TAE vs monthly: SMD -3.024, 95% CI -4.584 to -1.465; PRN vs bimonthly: SMD -1.919, 95% CI -3.307 to -0.532; PRN vs monthly: SMD -3.852, 95% CI -5.717 to -1.988). However, injection count did not differ significantly between the TAE and PRN regimens (TAE vs PRN: SMD 0.828, 95% CI -0.847 to 2.503). Nonetheless, the TAE regimen was associated with fewer clinic visits than the PRN regimen.
Conclusion:
The TAE regimen maintains efficacy while reducing treatment burden in patients with wet AMD receiving intravitreal aflibercept.
More Related Videos
07:04Electroporation-Based Genetic Modification of Primary Human Pigment Epithelial Cells Using the Sleeping Beauty Transposon System
Published on: February 4, 2021
08:54Author Spotlight: Understanding Age-Related Macular Degeneration Pathophysiology with QAF Workflow
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Diabetic Retinopathy
Glaucoma: Overview