Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Stakeholder input towards further refinement and consolidation of the alternative safety profiling algorithm (ASPA)
Mirjam Luijten1,2, Matthias Herzler3, Femke Affourtit4
1Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Next generation risk assessment (NGRA) aims to enable transparent, reproducible chemical safety assessments based on human-relevant, animal-free new approach methodologies (NAMs). The Alternative Safety Profiling Algorithm (ASPA) was developed within the ASPIS cluster to provide an algorithmic workflow that structures problem formulation, evidence integration, and decision-making across three main pillars – hazard, ADME (toxicokinetics), and exposure. A stakeholder workshop was organized to refine ASPA. Four breakout groups systematically reviewed corresponding workflow sections, identifying strengths, conceptual gaps, and opportunities for harmonization. Across groups, participants endorsed ASPA’s modular, technology-neutral nature and its focus on standardizing processes rather than prescribing specific test batteries. The hazard pillar discussions emphasized a sensitive, hypothesis-generating Tier 1, complemented by a specific, mechanistic Tier 2, capable of deriving points of departure (PoDs). ADME experts supported a physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling strategy, advancing from generic towards more complex models, using mechanistic information and experimental data. The exposure group proposed refinements for transparent, tiered exposure modelling, with emphasis on realistic worst-case scenarios and explicit uncertainty communication. Cross-pillar discussions highlighted the importance of feedback loops among all pillars, and the documentation of decision points to achieve consistency and defensibility. The workshop outcomes informed three parallel developments: (i) algorithmic refinement and re-design toward the next ASPA version, (ii) the creation of detailed guidance for each building block, and (iii) the establishment of practical case studies to demonstrate workflow implementation. This report already contains a first case study (developmental neurotoxicity assessment of desnitro-imidacloprid). These advances increase the operability, transparency, and regulatory readiness of ASPA.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Relative Risk

