Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Knee Arthrocentesis in Adults
Published on: February 25, 2022
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intra-articular Injection Treatments for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review
Chunlin Liu1, Jiawen Deng1, Aazad Abbas1
1University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Canada.
Background:
Hip osteoarthritis is a debilitating condition that leads to progressive joint pain and stiffness. While total hip arthroplasty provides definitive treatment, intra-articular injections offer a less invasive alternative for patients. Several injection options are available, including corticosteroids (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Previous reviews and network meta-analyses have compared the short-term efficacy of these injections, but it remains unclear if a particular injection provides superior symptom relief for up to 12 months.
Purpose:
To provide an updated summary of the current hip intra-articular injection literature and compare the efficacy of all injection types at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Study Design:
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 1.
Methods:
Four databases were queried: Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The primary outcome measures were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Total Score (WOMAC-Total) and the visual analog scale (VAS) at 3, 6, and 12 months. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess study quality. Treatment effects were expressed as mean differences for the WOMAC-Total and standardized mean differences for the VAS.
Results:
A total of 14 studies were included in the final analysis with 1254 participants. Eight unique intra-articular injection types were identified: CS, HA of varying molecular weights (low, high, and ultra-high), PRP, CS + high molecular weight HA, PRP + HA, and standard of care/placebo (SOC/PBO) group. When compared with SOC/PBO, no statistically significant differences in WOMAC-Total and VAS outcomes were observed between any injections at 3, 6, or 12 months.
Conclusion:
There were no statistically significant differences in WOMAC-Total and VAS outcomes at any time point between all injection types to baseline. Future studies should compare the long-term efficacy of various intra-articular injections with a control and examine the efficacy of combined injections.
Registration:
CRD42024574937 (PROSPERO identifier).

