Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Comprehensive Assessment of Germline Chemical Toxicity Using the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: February 22, 2015
A Robust, High-Content NAM for Repeatable and Predictive Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Assessment in C.
Sudip Mondal1, Adam Laing1, Amber Shen1
1vivoVerse, LLC.
None:
Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART) assessment is essential for product safety evaluation and currently relies heavily on vertebrate models that are costly, time-consuming, and resource-intensive. Caenorhabditis elegans has emerged as a promising New Approach Methodology (NAM) for rapid, cost-effective, whole-organism toxicology studies. However, broader adoption has been limited by the lack of high-resolution, rapid imaging approaches, a limited range of endpoints, and insufficient evidence for assay robustness and repeatability. To overcome these limitations, we developed a multiparametric imaging-based assay for assessing DART-related endpoints in C. elegans, building on our previously published microfluidic-based developmental toxicity platform. We expanded the machine learning-based body dimension analysis to include quantification of total embryo number and in utero embryonic development by classifying embryos as early- or late-stage to assess reproductive health. The assay relies on high-resolution brightfield imaging, enabled by the vivoChip microfluidic device, and is compatible with any strain. This study demonstrates highly repeatable results with mean coefficients of variation of 1-5% for developmental endpoints and 6-17% for reproductive-related endpoints, supporting high statistical power. Validation using methylmercury and propiconazole and by phenotyping (scoring and classification) ~ 400,000 embryos across ~ 9,200 worms, demonstrated reproducible, concentration-dependent responses across all endpoints with narrow confidence intervals. Notably, late-stage embryos were the most sensitive endpoint, with effects preceding changes in total embryo count, body size, or viability. Importantly, worms remained > 97% viable and motile across all tested concentrations, indicating that the observed effects reflect DART-specific responses rather than non-specific apical endpoints such as lethality. These results demonstrate a sensitive, repeatable, and scalable DART platform capable of rapid, cost-effective chemical prioritization for safety assessment.

