Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock
Nadia Aissaoui1, Clement Delmas2,3, Hamid Merdji4
1Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publqiue des Hopitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Insights
New French guidelines offer updated recommendations for managing cardiogenic shock (CS) in adults. These guidelines emphasize multidisciplinary teams, early etiological treatment, and specific hemodynamic support strategies for improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Existing European guidelines for cardiogenic shock (CS) management are over a decade old.
- There is a need for updated, evidence-based recommendations for adult CS patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop comprehensive recommendations for the management of cardiogenic shock in adults.
- To provide guidance on CS teams, medical and etiological management, organ support, and circulatory support.
Main Methods:
- Development of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
- Expert consensus from multiple French societies including Intensive Care, Cardiology, Anesthesia, and Thoracic/Cardiovascular Surgery.
- Identification of 23 "Patient Intervention Comparator Outcome" (PICO) questions to formulate 41 recommendations.
Main Results:
- 41 recommendations were generated across six key areas of CS management.
- Recommendations include the importance of multidisciplinary shock teams and standardized protocols.
- Guidance on hemodynamic support prioritizes norepinephrine and selective inotropes, with mechanical support reserved for select cases.
Conclusions:
- Optimal cardiogenic shock management requires a structured, multidisciplinary approach and regional networks.
- Early etiological treatment, such as revascularization or valve intervention, is crucial for improving outcomes.
- Hemodynamic support strategies and the judicious use of mechanical circulatory support are key components of effective CS care.
Abstract:
The last specific international European recommendations regarding the management of cardiogenic shock (CS) regardless of the etiology were issued over 10 years ago. We present herein recommendations for the management of CS in adults, developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system by an expert group of from the French Intensive Care Society [Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF)] and the French Society of Cardiology [Société Française de Cardiologie (SFC)], with the participation of the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)], and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery [Société Française de Chirurgie Thoracique et Cardio-Vasculaire (SFCTCV)]. The recommendations covered six fields of application: CS teams and expert centers, symptomatic medical management, etiological management, organ support, temporary circulatory support and de-escalation and early post-CS management. Twenty-three "Patient Intervention Comparator Outcome" (PICO) questions were identified, leading to 41 recommendations regarding management of CS in adult patients. Seven recommendations were scored with high level of evidence (Grade 1), 11 with moderate level of evidence (Grade 2) and 17 with low level of evidence (Expert opinion). In 6 cases, the experts were not able to give an answer. All of the recommendations obtained strong agreement from the expert committee. The experts highlight the fact that optimal management of CS requires organization including a structured, multidisciplinary shock team and regional referral network, applying standardized protocols for diagnosis and staging. Early etiological treatment-such as culprit-lesion revascularization or urgent valve intervention-is central to improve outcomes. Hemodynamic support should prioritize norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor and privilege selective inotrope use. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (Impella, VA-ECMO) should be reserved for carefully selected patients following discussion by the expert team.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

