Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Computational and Experimental Approaches in Precision Oncology
Published on: December 1, 2023
Artificial intelligence in oncology publishing: a systematic review and policy analysis of high-impact journals
Raffaele Giusti1, Marco Filetti2, Pasquale Lombardi3
1Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy.
Background:
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping scholarly communication, yet guidance for its responsible use remains uneven across biomedical journals. We aimed to systematically assess editorial policies governing AI-assisted writing in high-impact oncology journals.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review of publicly available editorial and normative documents, operationalized as a cross-sectional policy audit. Oncology journals with a 2023 Journal Impact Factor ≥5 (JCR 2024) were included. Author instructions, editorial policies, and publisher statements issued between January 2020 and March 2025 were analyzed across four domains: authorship, disclosure, permissible uses, and enforcement.
Results:
Sixty journals met inclusion criteria. Most journals prohibit AI systems as authors (58/60, 96.7%), reaffirming human accountability. Disclosure of AI use is mandated by 58/60 journals (96.7%), although reporting requirements vary in placement and specificity. Permissible uses are recognized by 58/60 journals (96.7%), generally limited to language editing and formatting under human supervision, while autonomous content generation or interpretation is discouraged. Enforcement provisions are present in 21/60 journals (35.0%), indicating incomplete standardization. At publisher level, disclosure adoption is universal in Elsevier (17/17), Springer Nature (20/20), AACR (6/6), Wiley (6/6), and AMA (1/1), and present in 8/10 journals in the "Other" category. Enforcement varies widely across publishers.
Discussion:
Editorial policies show strong convergence on core principles but remain heterogeneous in implementation, particularly regarding enforcement. We propose a cross-publisher "AI Policy Minimum Dataset" including standardized disclosures, defined permissible uses, and proportionate enforcement mechanisms, supported by transparent and regularly updated policy frameworks. Greater harmonization is essential to ensure integrity, accountability, and equitable use of AI in oncology publishing.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
07:50Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cancer
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Cancer Survival Analysis