Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Real-World High-Intensity Interval Training Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvement
Published on: February 22, 2022
High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training for COPD: a systematics review and
1Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Turkey.
Background:
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD) leads to reduced exercise capacity, lung function, and muscle dysfunction, highlighting the need for effective rehabilitation. Exercise is a key component of COPD management.
Purpose:
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) on functional capacity, pulmonary function, and muscle performance in individuals with COPD.
Methods:
Eight electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2025. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's Tool and the ROBINS-I tool.
Results:
Twelve studies with 401 participants were included. Seven of the included studies involved patients with GOLD stage III (severe COPD), and five involved patients with GOLD stage II (moderate COPD). HIIT did not demonstrate a statistically significant superiority over MICT in improving lung function parameters (p > .05). The combined mean difference for FEV1 was 6.84 (95% CI: -1.59 to 15.28; p = .11) and the mean difference for FEV1/FVC was 1.15 (95% CI: -8.98 to 11.28; p = .82). In terms of functional capacity, MICT showed superiority for VO2peak (MD = -41.79 mL/min, 95% CI [-74.77, -8.81], p = .01; I2 = 39%, p = .12), while HIIT significantly improved 6MWT performance (MD = 14.63 m, 95% CI [1.00, 28.25], p = .04; I2 = 33%, p = .22); no significant difference was observed for 12MWT (MD = -55.00 m, 95% CI [-147.40, 37.40], p = .24). In terms of muscle function, HIIT provided greater benefits than MICT, including improvements in respiratory pressure, quadriceps endurance, handgrip strength, and muscle fiber composition.
Conclusion:
HIIT is superior to MICT in improving selected functional capacity outcomes and muscle function in COPD patients, and shows comparable effects to MICT in other functional measures. HIIT is a viable alternative training method; further research is needed to determine optimal protocols to maximize its benefits.
More Related Videos
07:10Home-Based Prescribed Pulmonary Exercise in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: August 24, 2019
07:40Impact of High-intensity Interval Exercise and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise on the Cardiac Troponin T Level at an Early Stage of Training
Published on: October 10, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
Chronic Inflammation