Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Outcomes and associated factors of revision procedures after failed total ankle arthroplasty: a comparative cohort
Kathrin Pfahl1,2, Julia Eder3, Dominic Simon4
1Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. Kathrin.Pfahl@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Introduction:
After failed total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), revision arthrodesis (RAA) and revision arthroplasty (RTAA) are treatment options, but comparative outcome data remain limited. The aim of this study was to compare mid-term survival of RAA and RTAA after failed primary TAA and to explore clinical and radiographic factors associated with failure.
Materials And Methods:
In this retrospective cohort study, 124 patients (RAA = 72, RTAA = 52) were reviewed after failed TAA between 2006 and 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess survival, and decision tree models were used as exploratory tools to identify factors associated with failure.
Results:
Mean follow-up was 71.6 ± 42.7 months. Surgical failure occurred in 6.45% of patients, with no significant difference (RAA 6.9%, RTAA 5.8%). Five-year survival was slightly higher for RTAA (97% vs. 93%), although durability decreased beyond 87 months. Female sex, higher BMI, and younger age were associated with failure after RAA, whereas large periprosthetic cysts and elevated BMI were related to failure after RTAA.
Conclusions:
RAA and RTAA demonstrate comparable mid-term survival after failed TAA. Revision strategy selection should be individualized, considering bone stock, patient characteristics, and failure patterns.
Levels Of Evidence:
III.
