Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Assay for Adhesion and Agar Invasion in S. cerevisiae
Published on: November 8, 2006
Constitutively active RAS prolongs Cdc42 signalling, while MAPK signalling is attenuated during fission yeast mating
Emma J Kelsall1, Akatsuki Kimura2,3,4, Ábel Vértesy5
1Division of Molecular and Cell Biology, School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
The small GTPase RAS is a signalling hub activating multiple pathways, which may respond differently to a constitutively active RAS mutation. We explored this issue in fission yeast, where RAS-mediated pheromone signalling (PS) activates two downstream pathways: the MAPKSpk1 and Cdc42 pathways. We observed that the yeast RAS mutation ras1.G17V, an equivalent of the mammalian ras.G12V oncogenic mutation, causes prolonged Cdc42 activation, whereas MAPKSpk1 activation was transient and attenuated. To explain this observation, we generated a PS framework by conducting genetic epistasis analysis of PS mutants and biochemical analysis of two Ras1 effectors, Cdc42-GEFScd1 and MAPKKKByr2, each of which triggers activation of the Cdc42 and MAPKSpk1 pathways, respectively. Cdc42-GEFScd1 and MAPKKKByr2 directly interacted with Ras1 in vitro in a competitive manner, and overexpression of the Ras binding domain of either Cdc42-GEFScd1 or MAPKKKByr2 in cells inhibited both downstream pathways, confirming that Ras1 signalling branches into the MAPKSpk1 and Cdc42 pathways. In conjunction with the genetic epistasis analysis, we developed the PS framework-based mathematical model to test which network structures can explain the transient MAPKSpk1 activation profile. Incorporating a negative-feedback circuit acting on pheromone production or sensing enabled the model to quantitatively reproduce MAPKSpk1 dynamics in the wild type and 20 additional PS mutants. The predicted PS negative-feedback was experimentally confirmed by deleting Sxa2, the carboxypeptidase that degrades one of the mating pheromones, which led to hyperactivation of both MAPKSpk1 and Cdc42. Our study provides a holistic understanding of the fission yeast pheromone signalling network, explaining how RAS signalling propagates differently through two downstream pathways. Our PS mathematical model may serve as a valuable reference framework for analysing other RAS signalling systems.
Insights
Fission yeast RAS mutations differentially activate Cdc42 and MAPKSpk1 pathways. A mathematical model revealed a negative-feedback circuit crucial for regulating MAPKSpk1 signalling dynamics in this RAS signalling network.
Area of Science:
- Cellular signalling
- Molecular biology
- Systems biology
Background:
- RAS GTPases are key signalling hubs controlling diverse cellular processes.
- RAS-mediated signalling can activate multiple downstream pathways, potentially with differential responses to mutations.
- Fission yeast pheromone signalling (PS) involves RAS signalling, activating both the MAPKSpk1 and Cdc42 pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how a constitutively active RAS mutation (ras1.G17V) differentially affects downstream MAPKSpk1 and Cdc42 pathway activation in fission yeast.
- To elucidate the network structure governing RAS-mediated pheromone signalling, particularly the transient activation of MAPKSpk1.
- To develop and validate a mathematical model of the fission yeast pheromone signalling framework.
Main Methods:
- Genetic epistasis analysis of pheromone signalling mutants.
- Biochemical analysis of Ras1 effectors (Cdc42-GEFScd1 and MAPKKKByr2).
- Development of a mathematical model based on the pheromone signalling framework.
- Experimental validation of model predictions, including gene deletions (e.g., Sxa2).
Main Results:
- The ras1.G17V mutation caused prolonged Cdc42 activation but transient MAPKSpk1 activation.
- Ras1 signalling branches into MAPKSpk1 and Cdc42 pathways, with competitive interaction between effectors.
- A negative-feedback circuit regulating pheromone production/sensing was identified as essential for explaining MAPKSpk1 dynamics.
- Experimental deletion of Sxa2 confirmed the predicted negative-feedback, leading to hyperactivation of both pathways.
Conclusions:
- RAS signalling propagates distinctly through the MAPKSpk1 and Cdc42 pathways in fission yeast.
- A negative-feedback mechanism is critical for controlling the transient activation of the MAPKSpk1 pathway.
- The developed mathematical model provides a framework for understanding RAS signalling networks and can be adapted for other systems.
Related Concept Videos
MAPK Signaling Cascades
Yeast Signaling
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
The Ras Gene
Ras is a...
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...

