Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
Published on: May 24, 2024
The Real-Time Support Role of Augmented Reality Technology in Shared Decision-Making in Neurosurgery Under the SEGUE
Zhengbo Yuan1, Zhongjie Shi1,2, Zhanxiang Wang2,3
1Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Augmented reality (AR) significantly improved objective understanding and satisfaction in neurosurgery preoperative risk communication compared to traditional models. This technology enhances shared decision-making without increasing consultation time.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Medical Education
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Preoperative risk communication in neurosurgery is crucial for shared decision-making (SDM).
- Traditional methods like verbal explanations often fall short in conveying complex neuroanatomy and risks, leading to patient dissatisfaction and potential disputes.
- Augmented reality (AR) offers a novel approach with patient-specific, interactive 3D visualizations to enhance these crucial conversations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if AR-assisted preoperative risk communication improves objective understanding and other SDM-related outcomes.
- To compare AR's effectiveness against conventional physical anatomical models within a standardized protocol.
- To assess AR's impact on patient comprehension, satisfaction, anxiety, and communication efficiency.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial involving 62 neurosurgery communication recipients (patients or legally authorized representatives).
- Participants were stratified by surgical approach (frontal, parietal, occipital) and randomized to either an AR group or a control (physical model) group.
- The primary outcome was post-session objective understanding via a knowledge questionnaire; secondary outcomes included subjective understanding, satisfaction, anxiety, and communication duration.
Main Results:
- Objective understanding was significantly higher in the AR group compared to the physical model group (P=.01).
- Communication satisfaction was also markedly higher with AR (P<.001).
- No significant differences were observed in subjective understanding, anxiety changes, or communication duration between the groups. Exploratory analyses indicated greater comprehension gains with AR for parietal and occipital approaches.
Conclusions:
- AR, integrated with patient-specific models and interactivity, enhances objective understanding and satisfaction in preoperative neurosurgical risk communication.
- This visualization tool improves SDM without extending face-to-face communication time.
- Further multicenter trials are recommended to confirm effectiveness and explore implementation and cost-effectiveness.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
Published on: August 9, 2024
10:25Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
Published on: September 2, 2025