Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Healthcare practitioners' engagement with non-specialists: A scoping review
Elise Newell1, Erinn Hawkins1, Sameer Deshpande1
1Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Objectives:
Health systems worldwide are under pressure, with workforce shortages undermining access, quality and equity of care. Task-sharing with non-specialists who are embedded in the service user's community offers a promising solution. Evidence suggests that their added value brings cultural insight, trust and connection that can improve service user engagement and outcomes. Yet, non-specialists remain underused for reasons that are not fully understood. This review synthesises the literature on healthcare practitioners' (HCP) experiences of engaging non-specialists in client care, across professions and global contexts, to identify what enables or hinders meaningful collaboration between the two workforces.
Study Design:
A scoping review design was utilised.
Methods:
Systematic searches were conducted in four academic databases: PubMed, Embase via Elsevier, Web of Science and CINAHL via Ebsco. Data was extracted and thematically analysed using an inductive-deductive approach guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Results:
Seventy-eight studies met inclusion criteria. Most were from high-income countries (n = 61) and used qualitative designs (n = 52). Studies represented a range of disciplines and occupations. Influential factors primarily mapped onto two CFIR domains representing the dynamics of the workplace and characteristics of individuals within the workplace. Barriers (e.g., interprofessional tension, concerns regarding insufficient training or supervision of non-specialists), facilitators (e.g., work infrastructure, relational connections, teamwork and shared learning), and self-reported experiences (e.g., multiple benefits for service users including increased access to care and improved outcomes) offered insights into how HCPs perceive and navigate task-sharing with non-specialists.
Conclusions:
HCPs are intermediaries to successful implementation and task-sharing cannot succeed without their support. This review provides the first synthesis of factors that shape engagement with task-sharing and provides actionable insights for policymakers, service leaders and researchers.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Secondary Healthcare System
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...

