Trajectories of coronary sinus pacing cathode to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy outcome: The TRAJECTORIES

Cristiana Corsi1, Stefano Severi1, Laura Lanzoni2

  • 1Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Bologna, Cesena Campus, Italy.

Heart Rhythm
|April 17, 2026
PubMed

Insights

A new TRAJ-index, derived from 3D coronary sinus lead trajectory, can help predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. This imaging-based method aids in selecting optimal pacing sites during CRT implantation.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Predicting patient response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains a clinical challenge.
  • Fluoroscopy-based 3D reconstruction of the coronary sinus (CS) lead trajectory (3DTraj) offers a novel imaging approach.
  • Evaluating the 3DTraj's potential for optimizing CRT lead placement is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the correlation between left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and acute changes in 3DTraj geometry post-biventricular pacing (BiV) initiation.
  • To determine if the 3DTraj can serve as an intra-procedural tool for guiding CS lead pacing site selection.
  • To evaluate the predictive value of the TRAJ-index for CRT response.

Main Methods:

  • 3DTraj of the pacing cathode was reconstructed before (T-1) and after (T0) BiV initiation in 6 centers.
  • The TRAJ-index was calculated as the percentage change in 3DTraj main axes ratios between T-1 and T0.
  • TRAJ-index was correlated with LV end-systolic volume reduction at follow-up; receiver-operator analysis determined the optimal threshold.

Main Results:

  • The TRAJ-index demonstrated 77% overall accuracy (AUC=0.86) in predicting CRT response.
  • It achieved 88% sensitivity for positive response and 66% for negative response.
  • Prediction accuracy was reduced in patients with large LV volumes and significant mitral regurgitation.

Conclusions:

  • The TRAJ-index shows promise as an intra-operative tool to guide CS pacing site selection during CRT implantation.
  • This method may improve CRT procedural outcomes without requiring additional specialized equipment.
  • Further validation is warranted to refine its application in specific patient subgroups.
Abstract