Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

486
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
486
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

335
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
335
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

8.5K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
8.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

355
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the...
355
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Virtual walks in the Ising model: Finite-time scaling.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Forager with intermittent rest: Better for survival?

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Effect of presence of rigid impurities in a system of annihilating domain walls with dynamic bias.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Biswas-Chatterjee-Sen kinetic exchange opinion model for two connected groups.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Interactive anisotropic walks in two dimensions generated from a three-state opinion dynamics model.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Modeling biases in binary decision-making within the generalized nonlinear q-voter model.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same journal

Erratum: Low-dimensional model for adaptive networks of spiking neurons [Phys. Rev. E 111, 014422 (2025)].

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Disentangling the effects of many-body forces on depletion interactions.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Charge transport and mode transition in dual-energy electron beam diodes.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Optimization of multisite reactions in complex compartmentalized media.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Origin of geometric cohesion in nonconvex granular materials: Interplay between interdigitation and rotational constraints enhancing frictional stability.

Physical review. E·2026
Same journal

Interaction of walkers with a standing Faraday wave.

Physical review. E·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.4K

Analyzing contrarian behavior using nonlinear biased q-voter model.

Amit Pradhan1, Pratik Mullick2, Parongama Sen1

  • 1University of Calcutta, Department of Physics, 92 Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, Kolkata 700009, West Bengal, India.

Physical Review. E
|April 18, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Contrarians in the q-voter model prevent consensus by opposing majority influence. Higher contrarian fractions promote opinion diversity but cannot achieve perfect parity due to inherent bias.

More Related Videos

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

8.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.4K
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

8.0K

Area of Science:

  • Sociophysics
  • Complex Systems Modeling
  • Opinion Dynamics

Background:

  • The q-voter model is a standard framework for studying opinion formation.
  • Existing models often assume agents conform to majority influence.
  • Weighted-influence variants introduce nuanced social interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of contrarian agents on opinion dynamics within a weighted-influence q-voter model.
  • To introduce and analyze the role of a fraction (α) of contrarians.
  • To understand how contrarianism interacts with a bias parameter (p) in shaping collective opinion.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical mean-field calculations.
  • Monte Carlo simulations.
  • Analysis of temporal relaxation and convergence time scales.

Main Results:

  • Phase boundaries at p=1/2 and α=1/2 determine system states (majority/minority opinions).
  • Increasing contrarian fraction (α) drives systems towards balanced opinion coexistence.
  • Bias parameter (p) prevents exact parity, maintaining a slight majority.
  • Contrarians suppress full consensus and maintain opinion diversity.

Conclusions:

  • Contrarians act as structured nonconformists, crucial for maintaining opinion diversity.
  • The interplay between contrarianism (α) and bias (p) governs the degree of consensus and diversity.
  • The model provides insights into how nonconformity influences collective opinion formation in social systems.