Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Genome Editing and Directed Differentiation of hPSCs for Interrogating Lineage Determinants in Human Pancreatic Development
Published on: March 5, 2017
From "Simulation" to "Mirror": Gene editing and humanization redefines the next-generation precision oncology animal
Zhengyi Wang1, Liang Zhou1, Lan Ming1
1Department of Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Abstract:
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, although conventionally used in oncology, exhibit critical limitations: they frequently lose patient-specific genetic mutations and lack the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) diversity essential for immune recognition, and fail to recapitulate the human tumor microenvironment (TME). These deficiencies contribute to immunotherapy prediction failure rates exceeding 80% in clinical translation. To address these gaps, we propose a Tumor Model 2.0 framework. This framework integrates multi-omics data (whole-genome, transcriptomic, and proteomic) with precision genome editing technologies (CRISPR-Cas9 and Prime Editing) to reconstruct patient-specific mutations across multiple biological layers. Employing an organoid-animal coupling platform with stepwise immune system construction and microenvironment remodeling-subsequently validated in large animals-the framework enables the creation of programmable, patient-specific digital twins. These high-fidelity models support personalized N-of-1 clinical trials, bridging the gap between preclinical research and clinical precision oncology.
Insights
This study introduces Tumor Model 2.0, a novel framework for creating precise, patient-specific cancer models. These advanced models overcome limitations of traditional methods, improving preclinical research for personalized oncology and immunotherapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Immunology
Background:
- Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models lack patient-specific mutations and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) diversity, failing to replicate the tumor microenvironment (TME).
- These limitations lead to over 80% immunotherapy prediction failure in clinical translation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an advanced preclinical model framework, "Tumor Model 2.0", addressing the deficiencies of conventional PDX models.
- To create high-fidelity, patient-specific cancer models for improved immunotherapy prediction and personalized medicine.
Main Methods:
- Integration of multi-omics data (whole-genome, transcriptomic, proteomic) with precision genome editing (CRISPR-Cas9, Prime Editing).
- Development of an organoid-animal coupling platform with stepwise immune system construction and microenvironment remodeling.
- Validation in large animal models to create programmable, patient-specific digital twins.
Main Results:
- Reconstruction of patient-specific mutations across multiple biological layers in novel preclinical models.
- Successful creation of programmable, patient-specific digital twins with enhanced TME and HLA diversity.
- Demonstration of a viable framework for N-of-1 clinical trials.
Conclusions:
- Tumor Model 2.0 offers a significant advancement over traditional PDX models for cancer research.
- This framework bridges the gap between preclinical studies and clinical precision oncology, enhancing immunotherapy development.
- The programmable, patient-specific digital twins facilitate personalized N-of-1 clinical trials.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In-vitro Mutagenesis
What is Genetic Engineering?
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
CRISPR

