Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 20, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Effect of implant number and spatial configuration on reverse torque values of screw-retained restorations after
Athanasios Stratos1, Athina Niakou2, Stylianos Rodiou3
1Clinical Instructor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Statement Of Problem:
Screw loosening has been observed in screw-retained multiunit implant prostheses. The effects of implant number, spatial configuration, and screw position on preload retention remain unclear.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the reverse torque values and torque-loss patterns after mechanical aging in screw-retained prostheses on different numbers of implants and configurations.
Material And Methods:
Thirty screw-retained, implant-supported cobalt chromium (Remanium Star Co-Cr powder; Dentaurum GmbH & Co KG) framework specimens were fabricated by laser sintering, fastened on multiunit abutments (EL OMNI; Century Technologies S.R.L.), and randomly assigned to 3 groups comprised of 2 parallel implants (15×3.8 mm ΕL; Century Technologies S.R.L.) placed 10-mm apart, 4 parallel implants placed in a straight line with 10 mm spacing, and 4 parallel implants with an anteroposterior spread, with the 2 distal segments in 45-degree angulation. The prosthetic screws (SSR-ASC; Century Technologies S.R.L.) were tightened to 20 Ncm, and initial values were recorded. Mechanical aging followed (1 200 000 cycles, 70 N, 60 mm/second, dry conditions) with vertical loading via a 2-mm-rounded pin. Final reverse torque values and percentage torque loss were calculated relative to 20 Ncm. The primary analysis was the torque loss of the 2 screws adjacent to the load across all groups, and the secondary analysis was the force distribution patterns. Data were analyzed using 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc comparisons.
Results:
Torque loss was highest at load-adjacent screws, with 2-implant prostheses showing 36.0% and 27.5% loss, straight 4-implant prostheses 23.5%, 13.5%, 8.5%, and 4.5% from the loaded to contralateral screws, and anteroposterior spread 4-implant prostheses 20.0%, 11.0%, 15.0%, and 4.0%. P<.001 indicated a significant loss of RTVs in the 2-implant group.
Conclusions:
Based on the findings of this in vitro study, increasing the number of implants improved the reverse torque values for the prosthetic screws. Load-adjacent screws experienced the most significant torque loss, while anteroposterior spread configurations demonstrated localized vulnerability at angled junctions after mechanical aging.
More Related Videos
07:32Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024