Direct oral anticoagulants vs dual antiplatelet therapy following left atrial appendage closure in atrial fibrillation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Wulamiding Kaisaier1, Zixuan Xu2, Min Ye1
1Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Insights
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) show lower device-related thrombosis and bleeding events compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, with similar stroke and mortality rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Antithrombotic Therapy
Background:
- Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
- Optimal post-LAAC antithrombotic therapy, specifically direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus DAPT in the early post-implant period after LAAC in AF patients.
- To evaluate outcomes including device-related thrombosis, stroke, mortality, and bleeding events.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed and Embase until November 2025.
- Inclusion of RCTs comparing DOACs with DAPT post-LAAC.
- Pooled analysis of efficacy (device-related thrombosis, stroke, all-cause mortality) and safety (major/minor bleeding) outcomes using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Main Results:
- Three RCTs with 704 AF patients (368 DOAC, 336 DAPT) were analyzed.
- DOACs significantly reduced device-related thrombosis (OR=0.16), major bleeding (OR=0.46), and minor bleeding (OR=0.59) compared to DAPT.
- No significant differences were found in stroke (OR=0.46) or all-cause mortality (OR=0.60) between groups.
Conclusions:
- Short-term DOAC-based regimens after LAAC in AF patients are associated with reduced device-related thrombosis and bleeding events compared to DAPT.
- DOACs represent a favorable short-term antithrombotic strategy post-LAAC in selected patients.
- No significant differences in stroke or mortality were observed between DOACs and DAPT.
Background:
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an established alternative to oral anticoagulants for preventing thromboembolic events for selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, optimal post-procedural antithrombotic therapy remains uncertain, particularly regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).
Objective:
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of DOACs vs DAPT in the early post-implant period following LAAC in patients with AF.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed and Embase until November 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DOACs with DAPT after LAAC. Efficacy outcomes included device-related thrombosis (DRT), stroke, and all-cause mortality, whereas safety outcomes encompassed major and minor bleeding. Pooled effect estimates were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Where appropriate, fixed- or random-effects models were applied according to between-study heterogeneity.
Results:
3 RCTs (ADRIFT, ADALA, ANDES) involving 704 patients (mean age 75.8-78.4 years; 65% males) were included, with 368 assigned to DOAC and 336 to DAPT. Baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risk were high (mean CHA2DS2-VASc 4.0-4.7; mean HAS-BLED 3.5-3.8). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 2-3 months. Compared with DAPT, DOACs were associated with significantly lower risks of DRT (OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.05-0.57), major bleeding (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26-0.81) and minor bleeding (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38-0.92). No significant differences were observed in stroke (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.07-3.13) and all-cause mortality (OR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.23-1.54).
Conclusion:
In randomized trials of patients with AF undergoing LAAC, short-term DOAC-based regimens were associated with lower rates of DRT and fewer bleeding events than DAPT, without differences in stroke or mortality. These findings support DOACs as a favorable short-term antithrombotic option after LAAC in selected patients.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

