Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Stress distribution of different attachment systems in mandibular implant overdentures: A 3D finite element study
Aysıla Tekeli Şimşek1, Mehmet Ali Güngör2, Ongun Çelikkol3
1Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Usak, Usak, Turkey.
Statement Of Problem:
The choice of attachment system in mandibular implant overdentures directly affects stress distribution in the implant-prosthesis-bone complex. Despite the wide use of different systems, their biomechanical performance has not been comprehensively compared, particularly for the recently introduced LOCATOR R-Tx design.
Purpose:
The purpose of this 3-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis FEA study was to compare and assess the biomechanical performance of the LOCATOR R-Tx attachment system with 4 different attachment systems.
Material And Methods:
A 3D model of an edentulous mandible was generated from computed tomography data and restored with 3 implants placed in the midline and canine regions. 5 attachment systems were digitally modeled, and FEA was performed under unilateral oblique (UO) and unilateral vertical (UV) loading conditions with a 200-N load. von Mises stress values were calculated for the implant and abutment, and maximum principal stress (Pmax) values were recorded for cortical and trabecular bone.
Results:
LOCATOR and LOCATOR R-Tx attachments exhibited the lowest von Mises stresses at the implant and abutment interfaces under both loading conditions. Telescopic attachments generated the highest stresses, particularly under oblique loading. Ball attachments produced the lowest cortical and trabecular Pmax values, while bar attachments produced the highest. Oblique loading consistently generated higher stresses than vertical loading, and the stress concentration was greatest at the implant neck.
Conclusions:
LOCATOR type attachments, especially LOCATOR R-Tx, demonstrated favorable biomechanical performance by reducing stress transfer and distributing loads more uniformly. These features may lower the risk of implant overload and bone resorption. Within the limitations of this study, LOCATOR R-Tx appears to be the most advantageous option, offering predictable stress distribution in 3 implant mandibular overdentures.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain
Applications of Stress
The...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Components of Stress
Interestingly, the hidden cube faces also experience these stresses, equal and...

