The CAMUS Initiative: A Multiphase, Multicentre International Collaboration to Redefine Risk Stratification,

Christopher Soliman1,2, Niranjan J Sathianathen1,2, Niall M Corcoran1,2

  • 1Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

Insights

The Complications After Major and Minor Urological Surgery (CAMUS) initiative redefines surgical complication reporting. This global effort integrates patient outcomes and multidisciplinary input for improved risk stratification and transparency in urological surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Outcomes
  • Patient-Centered Care

Background:

  • Existing surgical complication classifications (e.g., Clavien-Dindo) are clinician-centered and intervention-focused.
  • These frameworks do not adequately capture cumulative, patient-centered outcomes.
  • There is a need for a more comprehensive and patient-inclusive approach to complication reporting and risk stratification in urological surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the Complications After Major and Minor Urological Surgery (CAMUS) initiative, a global effort to redefine complication reporting, risk stratification, and outcome measurement.
  • To develop a patient-inclusive classification system for surgical complications.
  • To improve transparency, standardize reporting, and inform patient-centered risk stratification worldwide.

Main Methods:

  • Assembled a retrospective dataset of 130,034 major urological procedures from 180 centers.
  • Conducted Delphi surveys with physicians (n=1113) and nurses (n=20) to achieve consensus on novel grading domains.
  • Incorporated patient-reported outcomes, developed a risk prediction index (IPRADES), and planned prospective validation with >2000 cases.

Main Results:

  • Generated consensus on novel grading domains emphasizing multidisciplinary perspectives.
  • Assembled the largest retrospective dataset for major urological procedures.
  • Developed the CAMUS Intraoperative and Postoperative Risk and Difficulty Estimation Index (IPRADES) for risk prediction.

Conclusions:

  • The CAMUS initiative represents the most comprehensive complication classification effort in surgery to date.
  • The developed system integrates over 130,000 procedures with global expert consensus.
  • CAMUS will deliver a reproducible, patient-inclusive classification system applicable to clinical practice, audits, education, and policy, enhancing patient-centered risk stratification.