Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Published on: March 3, 2023
Long-Term Outcome of No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating AFP-Positive Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Guodong Wu1, Xianqi Huang2, Xia Ou3
1Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Jiangbei Campus, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400020, People's Republic of China.
Objective:
This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy of no-touch radiofrequency ablation (NT-RFA) in treating patients with AFP-positive, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter of ≤ 3cm, and to assess its effect on AFP levels.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 245 AFP-positive HCC patients treated with NT-RFA (n=78) and Conventional RFA (C-RFA) (n=167) at our center between 2015 and 2023. The changes of AFP levels were compared. Statistical analysis was conducted on the overall survival(OS), recurrence free survival(RFS), and tumor recurrence status of the two groups at 1 to 5-years post-RFA.
Results:
The decrease in postoperative AFP levels was significantly greater in the NT-RFA group than that in the C-RFA group (P=0.009), and the postoperative AFP seronegative rate in the NT-RFA group was significantly higher than that in the C-RFA group (P=0.020). The OS rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-years were 100.00%, 71.07%, and 54.07% for NT-RFA group, while 95.21%, 62.06%, and 30.80% for C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.026). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in the NT-RFA group were 79.49%, 46.36%, and 29.96%, while 65.87%, 30.99%, and 21.20% in the C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.025). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local tumor progression-free survival (LTP-FS) rates were 89.67%, 83.31%, 81.06% in the NT-RFA group and 79.01%, 64.61%, 63.10% in the C-RFA group. Significant differences existed between the two groups (P=0.002). But there was no significant difference in intrahepatic distant recurrence-free survival (IDR-FS) between the two groups (P=0.819).
Conclusion:
Compared with C-RFA, NT-RFA treatment for AFP positive HCC ≤ 3cm is more effective in reducing postoperative AFP levels and improving the rate of AFP conversion to negative. Meanwhile, NT-RFA significantly increased RFS and OS. It can replace C-RFA as the primary treatment method for AFP-positive small HCC.
More Related Videos
09:11Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
05:56Evaluation of the Feasibility, Safety, and Accuracy of an Intraoperative High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Liver Metastases
Published on: January 9, 2019