Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Microbiological evaluation of different agitation methods of irrigation during endodontic procedure - A randomized
Ruchi Vashist1, Umesh Kumar1, Archana Angrup2
1Department of Oral Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Introduction:
Elimination of microorganisms from the root canal system is a prerequisite for predictable endodontic success. Among persistent pathogens, Enterococcus faecalis poses a significant challenge due to its biofilm-forming capacity and resistance to standard irrigants. This study aimed to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of three irrigation modalities - conventional syringe irrigation, sonic activation, and ultrasonic activation - in reducing E. faecalis colony-forming unit (CFU) counts in infected canals.
Methods:
Sixty-five patients scheduled for endodontic retreatment were randomly assigned to three irrigation protocols: conventional (n = 20), sonic (n = 22), and ultrasonic (n = 23) irrigation. Microbial samples were collected pre- and postirrigation. Bacterial reduction was evaluated using culture-based CFU analysis, followed by appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical tests (α = 0.05).
Results:
Only the ultrasonic group demonstrated a statistically meaningful reduction in CFU levels (P = 0.011). Comparative analysis revealed a significant difference among the three groups, with ultrasonic activation showing superior antimicrobial effectiveness (ANOVA P = 0.011; Kruskal-Wallis P = 0.0003). Sonic activation produced inconsistent reductions, while syringe irrigation showed a negligible effect.
Conclusion:
Ultrasonically activated irrigation demonstrated superior antimicrobial efficacy over sonic and conventional techniques, supporting its use as an adjunctive strategy for improved endodontic disinfection.
Related Concept Videos
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness

