Non-invasive Evaluation of Myocardial Fibrosis Using T1 and T2 Mapping by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Maynor Jose Lopez Mendoza1, Nicolle Contreras Figueroa2, Maria Antonieta Salazar Estrada3

  • 1Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Hospital de las Mujeres Dr. Adolfo Carit Eva (CARITEVA), San José, CRI.

Cureus
|April 20, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Myocardial fibrosis, a key factor in heart disease outcomes, can be accurately assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parametric mapping. These advanced CMR techniques offer precise quantification of fibrosis and inflammation, improving risk stratification and treatment guidance.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Myocardial fibrosis is a significant contributor to adverse outcomes in various cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death.
  • Fibrosis can manifest as focal or diffuse interstitial patterns, driven by fibroblast activation and sustained extracellular matrix deposition, often amplified by inflammation and edema.
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a crucial non-invasive tool for assessing myocardial tissue characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role of advanced CMR parametric mapping techniques in characterizing myocardial fibrosis and inflammation.
  • To highlight the clinical utility of T1, T2, and extracellular volume fraction mapping in cardiovascular disease management.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized advanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parametric mapping techniques, including native T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction mapping.
  • Assessed the ability of these quantitative mapping techniques to detect and quantify diffuse interstitial myocardial fibrosis and myocardial edema/inflammation.
  • Compared the diagnostic and prognostic performance of parametric mapping with conventional imaging modalities and biomarkers.

Main Results:

  • Native T1 mapping and ECV fraction mapping effectively detect and quantify diffuse myocardial fibrosis, demonstrating significant prognostic value.
  • T2 mapping is highly sensitive to myocardial edema and active inflammation, aiding in the differentiation of acute versus chronic myocardial injury.
  • Integrated parametric mapping provides a comprehensive assessment of the inflammation-fibrosis continuum, offering superior tissue specificity and quantitative characterization compared to other methods.

Conclusions:

  • CMR parametric mapping techniques (T1, T2, ECV) offer a robust, quantitative, and reproducible method for assessing myocardial fibrosis and inflammation.
  • These advanced imaging techniques enhance risk stratification, predict adverse remodeling, guide therapeutic decisions, and monitor treatment response in diverse cardiovascular conditions.
  • Parametric mapping represents a significant advancement in myocardial tissue characterization, providing deeper insights into the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases.