Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands
Published on: August 29, 2019
UbiQTree: Uncertainty quantification in XAI with tree ensembles
Akshat Dubey1,2, Aleksandar Anžel1, Bahar İlgen1
1Center for Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Research (ZKI-PH), Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
This study introduces a novel method to quantify uncertainty in Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values, crucial for reliable AI in healthcare. It decomposes uncertainty, enhancing model interpretability and decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence
- Machine Learning Interpretability
- Computational Statistics
Background:
- Explainable AI (XAI) is vital for understanding complex models, especially ensemble tree-based methods.
- Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values are commonly used but often lack uncertainty quantification.
- Existing SHAP interpretations treat values as point estimates, ignoring aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for decomposing SHAP value uncertainty into aleatoric, epistemic, and entanglement components.
- To enhance the reliability and interpretability of SHAP attributions in critical applications like healthcare.
- To provide insights into managing and reducing uncertainty in AI model explanations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for uncertainty decomposition.
- Employed Dirichlet process (DP) hypothesis sampling over tree ensembles.
- Validated the approach through use-case analysis to reveal epistemic uncertainty insights.
Main Results:
- Successfully decomposed SHAP value uncertainty into distinct components.
- Demonstrated the presence and impact of epistemic uncertainty in SHAP explanations.
- Showcased how tree-based models, particularly bagging, can quantify these uncertainties.
Conclusions:
- Quantifying SHAP value uncertainty is essential for robust AI decision-making.
- Reducing epistemic uncertainty necessitates improvements in data quality and model development.
- The proposed method enhances trust and reliability in AI explanations for critical domains.
Related Concept Videos
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Uncertainty: Overview
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...

