Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.7K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

2.0K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
2.0K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.2K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.6K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.6K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.7K
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

504
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
504

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Open Syndrome Definition as a Machine-Readable Standard for Public Health: Design and Implementation Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Evaluating ensemble learning approaches for horizontal gene transfer detection.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A safety-centric perspective on innovation and risk in the use of artificial intelligence in genomics.

Trends in genetics : TIG·2026
Same author

The State of Peptide Detectability in Computational Proteomics and Guidelines for AI Applications.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same author

Advocating the potential of artificial intelligence for syndrome discovery in syndromic surveillance systems: A scoping review.

iScience·2026
Same author

Visualizing the Chain of Thought in Large Language Models.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2026
Same journal

Zero-shot reconstruction of mutant spatial transcriptomes.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Dendritic nonlinearities mitigate communication costs.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Agentic AI as a coordination paradigm in digital health and agri-food systems.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Spacing effect improves generalization in biological and artificial systems.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

A multi-modal foundation model for brain disease diagnosis and medical imaging.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

DuoMod-Net: Logarithmic balancing and geometric refinement for imbalanced semi-supervised medical image segmentation.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands
09:04

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands

Published on: August 29, 2019

UbiQTree: Uncertainty quantification in XAI with tree ensembles.

Akshat Dubey1,2, Aleksandar Anžel1, Bahar İlgen1

  • 1Center for Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Research (ZKI-PH), Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)
|April 20, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel method to quantify uncertainty in Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values, crucial for reliable AI in healthcare. It decomposes uncertainty, enhancing model interpretability and decision-making.

Keywords:
SHAPXAIensemble machine learningevidence theoryexplainabilityhealthcaremachine learningrandom foreststatisticsuncertainty

More Related Videos

Tree Core Analysis with X-ray Computed Tomography
06:56

Tree Core Analysis with X-ray Computed Tomography

Published on: September 22, 2023

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands
09:04

Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Three Distinct Methods in Pure Deciduous Stands

Published on: August 29, 2019

Tree Core Analysis with X-ray Computed Tomography
06:56

Tree Core Analysis with X-ray Computed Tomography

Published on: September 22, 2023

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning Interpretability
  • Computational Statistics

Background:

  • Explainable AI (XAI) is vital for understanding complex models, especially ensemble tree-based methods.
  • Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values are commonly used but often lack uncertainty quantification.
  • Existing SHAP interpretations treat values as point estimates, ignoring aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for decomposing SHAP value uncertainty into aleatoric, epistemic, and entanglement components.
  • To enhance the reliability and interpretability of SHAP attributions in critical applications like healthcare.
  • To provide insights into managing and reducing uncertainty in AI model explanations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for uncertainty decomposition.
  • Employed Dirichlet process (DP) hypothesis sampling over tree ensembles.
  • Validated the approach through use-case analysis to reveal epistemic uncertainty insights.

Main Results:

  • Successfully decomposed SHAP value uncertainty into distinct components.
  • Demonstrated the presence and impact of epistemic uncertainty in SHAP explanations.
  • Showcased how tree-based models, particularly bagging, can quantify these uncertainties.

Conclusions:

  • Quantifying SHAP value uncertainty is essential for robust AI decision-making.
  • Reducing epistemic uncertainty necessitates improvements in data quality and model development.
  • The proposed method enhances trust and reliability in AI explanations for critical domains.