Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Policy on Paper compared with Policy in Practice: A Study of Healthy Default Beverage Implementation and Enforcement
Samantha M Sundermeir1, Megan R Winkler2, Jennie N Davis3
1Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Background:
Healthy default beverage (HDB) policies, which require restaurants to offer healthier drinks with children's meals, may reduce child sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Although they are gaining popularity across the United States, restaurant awareness and compliance remains low, warranting deeper investigation into policy guidance and implementer knowledge.
Objective:
To examine implementing agencies' awareness of HDB policies, the prevalence of implementation and enforcement practices and their alignment with policy documents, and challenges to implementation and enforcement.
Methods:
We used a mixed-methods approach combining an analysis of HDB policy documents and an online survey of implementers across jurisdictions with state or local policies. A codebook was developed to assess implementation and enforcement provisions in policy documents. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey-reported practices, and we examined alignment between these practices and the corresponding policy language. Nineteen policy documents (4 state, 15 local) and 64 survey responses from unique jurisdictions were analyzed.
Results:
Among jurisdictions, 46 (72%) were knowledgeable about their policy. Most state jurisdictions (86%) and all local jurisdictions reported using a communication strategy regardless of inclusion in policy documents. Restaurant compliance was typically assessed through in-person restaurant visits (state: 78%; local: 42%). Equity-related implementation considerations included additional time for policy implementation (state: 43%; local: 60%) and technical support (state: 72%; local: 60%). Most state (67%) and local (73%) jurisdictions reported issuing warnings and fines for enforcement. Equity considerations for enforcement were reported for some state jurisdictions (27%) and included additional time to become compliant (75%) and issuing warnings without escalating to fines (25%). Implementation misalignment between practices and documents often reflected jurisdictions exceeding policy documents, whereas enforcement misalignment between practices and documents often involved inconsistent or incorrect use of the enforcement strategy in the policy document and misalignment of reported funding allocation.
Conclusions:
Although jurisdictions frequently expanded beyond written implementation requirements, enforcement knowledge and practices inconsistent with policy documents highlight potential gaps in resources, training, and infrastructure. Efforts to bolster implementer capacity and promote equitable approaches may increase the ability of localities to implement and enforce HDB policies.
More Related Videos
07:28Web-based Clinician Guide to Record Compatible Video of Standardized Drinking Task Kinematics for Computer Vision Analysis
Published on: November 28, 2025
08:01A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Regulation of Water Intake
Microbes in Beverage Production
Preventive Healthcare Services
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...