Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 21, 2026
Controlled Cortical Impact Model for Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 5, 2014
The effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy size in traumatic brain injury; an international, observational,
Rick J G Vreeburg1, Ranjit D Singh1, John K Yue2
1University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Center and Haga Teaching Hospital, Leiden and the Hague, the Netherlands.
Introduction:
Guidelines recommend large decompressive craniectomies (DC) in traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet the optimal size remains debated. Real-world practice often differs from guideline recommendations and generalizability of prior evidence to a broader TBI population is uncertain.
Research Question:
What is the comparative effectiveness of DC size on 12-month functional outcome in TBI?
Material And Methods:
We selected participants enrolled in the CENTER-TBI diagnosed with TBI who received a hemicraniectomy. Effect of DC size on functional outcome was evaluated with random-effects logistic regression, associating center case-mix adjusted DC sizes to GOSE. Center preference was quantified with the median odds ratio (MOR).
Results:
Among 4509 patients enrolled in CENTER-TBI, 295 underwent a hemicraniectomy. DC size varied from 37 cm2 to 165cm2 (IQR 96 cm2-123cm2, ellipsoid calculation), with a two-times higher probability of receiving a 27 cm2 larger (IQR increase) DC for a similar patient in one center versus another random center (adjusted MOR for DC size 1·7). Only 4 patients received a DC ≥ 12 × 15 cm (cm) or 15 cm in diameter, while 0 patients received a DC ≤ 6 × 8 cm. Larger DC size was not associated with more favorable 12-month GOSE scores (aOR 0.73 for 27 cm2 increase in DC size, 95%CI 0.47-1.1).
Discussion And Conclusion:
DC size varied widely across European centers. Recommended DC sizes were rarely reached, as were very small DC sizes. Larger versus smaller DC was associated with similar outcomes, however heterogeneity in DC indication may have attenuated observable treatment effects. Neurosurgeons may continue to prefer larger over smaller decompressions.
