Antibiotic resistance in odontogenic infections: A systematic review of current evidence and implications for guideline-based therapy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

Systematic Approach to Identify Novel Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Molecules from Plants' Extracts and Fractions to Prevent Dental Caries
Published on: March 31, 2021
Andrea Irmgard Schmid1,2, Richard Werkmeister3, Bilal Al-Nawas4
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Rübenacherstraße 170, Koblenz, 56072, Germany. Andreairschmid@gmail.com.
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: This review aims to summarize and evaluate the current evidence on antibiotic resistance in odontogenic infections, with a special focus on empirical therapy, resistance patterns, and guideline-based recommendations. The update of the German S3 guideline “Odontogenic Infections” provides the clinical and methodological framework for this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies published between 2016 and 2025 on antibiotic resistance in odontogenic infections. Both retrospective and prospective studies were included. Special attention was given to resistance rates of commonly used antibiotics and the differentiation of therapy in patients with suspected penicillin allergy. The selected studies were integrated into the German guideline development process to ensure relevance and consistency with current clinical practices. RESULTS: The review confirms increasing resistance rates for Penicillin G/V and aminopenicillins, particularly against Staphylococcus spp. In contrast, the combination of an aminopenicillin with a beta-lactamase inhibitor remains effective in most cases. Clindamycin shows notable resistance and is associated with higher rates of adverse effects. Recent studies suggest that certain cephalosporins, such as cefazolin, may be safe alternatives for patients with non-confirmed penicillin allergies. Clinical strategies such as PEN-FAST scoring and de-labeling are gaining increasing importance in managing suspected allergies. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical antibiotic therapy in odontogenic infections should be based on current resistance data and individualized patient risk profiles. Aminopenicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors remain the first-line choice; clindamycin should be reserved for selected cases with a justified suspicion of penicillin allergy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This review supports evidence-based antibiotic selection and promotes individualized therapy decisions to improve outcomes and minimize the development of antibiotic resistance. The findings have been integrated into the updated German S3 guideline, providing practical recommendations for dental and surgical care.
More Related Videos
06:18A Novel Method to Determine the Longitudinal Antibacterial Activity of Drug-Eluting Materials
Published on: March 3, 2023
08:04Quantitative Examination of Antibiotic Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Aggregates Using ATP-utilization Commercial Assays and Live/Dead Staining
Published on: February 8, 2019