Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

3D-Neuronavigation In Vivo Through a Patient's Brain During a Spontaneous Migraine Headache
Published on: June 2, 2014
Core Performance Measures for Migraine Headache: A Review by the American College of Physicians
Amir Qaseem1, Rhea E Powell2, Brook Watts3
1American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.Q., K.C., S.T.).
Abstract:
Migraine is a chronic condition that affects about 15% of the population in the United States and is characterized by recurrent, debilitating headache that lasts somewhere between 4 and 72 hours. Only 1 performance measure for migraine is currently in use in pay-for-performance programs. Although the American College of Physicians (ACP) broadly supports the role of performance measurement in performance improvement, this support is based on the principle that only measures that are evidence-based and meet high standards of methodological soundness are appropriate given their potential impact on patient care. ACP's Performance Measurement Committee reviews performance measures using a rigorous process to recognize high-quality performance measures, address gaps and areas for improvement in performance measures, and help reduce reporting burden. This article presents a review of 1 performance measure that includes migraine and considers a potential core performance measure using ACP's process to inform physicians, payers, and policymakers.
Insights
Migraine affects 15% of the US population, yet few performance measures exist. This review examines current migraine measures and proposes a core measure for better patient care quality.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Health Services Research
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Migraine is a prevalent chronic neurological disorder affecting 15% of the US population.
- Current performance measurement for migraine in pay-for-performance programs is limited, with only one measure in use.
- The American College of Physicians (ACP) emphasizes evidence-based, methodologically sound performance measures for quality improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the existing performance measure for migraine.
- To consider the development of a core performance measure for migraine management.
- To inform physicians, payers, and policymakers on migraine performance measurement.
Main Methods:
- Review of the current migraine performance measure.
- Application of the ACP's rigorous review process for performance measures.
- Consideration of criteria for a potential core performance measure.
Main Results:
- Identified a single existing performance measure for migraine.
- Highlighted the need for more robust and evidence-based performance measures.
- Proposed a framework for developing a core performance measure for migraine.
Conclusions:
- There is a significant gap in performance measurement for migraine care.
- The ACP's review process can guide the development of high-quality migraine performance measures.
- Improved performance measures are crucial for enhancing patient care and outcomes in migraine management.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology

