Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
Comparison of Drug Information Questions' Responses Between Drug Information Pharmacists and Artificial Intelligence
Lamia Alzahrani1, Arwa Alkhalaf2, Rayd Almehizia3
1Pharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Background:
Drug Information Centers (DICs) play a critical role in health care by providing accurate, evidence-based responses to drug-related inquiries. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into this domain offers opportunities to enhance efficiency and decision-making. This study aims to compare the accuracy and safety of drug information responses provided by drug information pharmacists and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including GPT-4o, Gemini, Copilot, and Medical Chat (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA; Google, Mountain View, CA, USA; Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA; Medical Chat, developer information not publicly specified).
Methods:
A retrospective, real-world study was conducted over 3 months at a tertiary hospital. The end points of this study are the statistical differences in overall accuracy of responses obtained from generative AI technologies and drug information pharmacists to drug information questions' responses measured in six dimensions.
Results:
GPT-4o and Medical Chat achieved composite scores comparable to DIC pharmacists (mean [standard deviation (SD)]: 18.3 [2.5], 17.5 [3.1], and 17.7 [3.5], respectively), while Gemini and Copilot showed lower performance (16.7 [3.5] and 16.4 [2.9]). Welch's analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated a significant difference in composite scores among groups (p < 0.001), with GPT-4o outperforming Gemini and Copilot in pairwise comparisons. Differences were also observed across question categories, with routine inquiries such as administration and dosing being more common than complex categories. Inter-rater agreement was low (Fleiss' kappa = 0.015, p = 0.297), indicating variability in scoring among evaluators.
Conclusion:
Some AI tools demonstrated performance comparable with pharmacists for routine drug information questions, while others showed lower reliability, particularly for clinically nuanced responses. Variability among tools and low rater agreement highlight the need for cautious interpretation and continued pharmacist oversight when using AI in drug information practice.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
05:33Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics: Overview
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Pharmacokinetics: Drug–Drug Interactions
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients