Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 22, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
How Inconsistent Reporting Affects Bullying Victimization Estimates: A Data-Adjusted Replication Study in 29 Low- and
1Centre for Childhood and Youth Research, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Introduction:
Although inconsistent reporting can alter research findings, it is seldom accounted for in most research areas. This study assessed the impact of inconsistent reporting on bullying victimization prevalence through a partial replication of a study in 29 countries.
Methods:
Analyses were restricted to adolescents aged 12-15 years (n = 191,228). Inconsistent reporting was defined based on contradictions in the responses to two bullying victimization items. Unadjusted prevalence estimates (i.e., all reports included) were compared with adjusted estimates (i.e., inconsistent reports excluded) based on relative changes and Cohen's h.
Results And Conclusions:
The mean percentage of inconsistent reporters was 7.4%. On average, their exclusion reduced bullying victimization prevalence by 13.5% (M∆ = -13.5%; Mh = 0.107). In about two-thirds of cases, adjusted estimates fell outside corresponding unadjusted confidence intervals. The present study confirms that inconsistent reporting can substantially bias bullying victimization prevalence estimates. It should therefore be systematically addressed whenever possible.
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Fundamental Attribution Error
Bystander Effect
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

