Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 11, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy: risk factors and prediction model
Dillen C van der Aa1,2,3, Rahaf Khatib1, Wietse J Eshuis1,2,3
1Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, North Holland, the Netherlands.
Background:
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) affect up to one-third of patients undergoing esophagectomy and remain a major contributor to postoperative morbidity. This study aimed to identify pre- and perioperative risk factors for PPCs and to develop a predictive model.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer at Amsterdam UMC between 2013 and 2023. PPCs included pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, atelectasis, respiratory failure, aspiration, acute respiratory distress syndrome, tracheobronchial fistula, and persistent air leakage. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression with backward selection were used to identify predictors. Model performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results:
Among 960 patients, 254 (26.5%) developed at least one PPC. Independent predictors were smoking status (former: OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.06; current: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.15-2.63), non-epidural analgesia (paravertebral: OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03-2.17; other: OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.88-2.82), and cervical versus intrathoracic anastomosis (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.17-2.29). Drain configuration also influenced the risk of PPC: one-sided double drains were protective (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.91), whereas bilateral drains increased the risk (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.38-4.87), compared with one-sided single drains. The model demonstrated modest discrimination after validation of AUC: 0.598.
Conclusion:
Smoking, paravertebral analgesia, cervical anastomosis, and bilateral drains were independently associated with increased PPC risk. Although predictive performance was modest, these modifiable and structural factors inform perioperative management. Future models should incorporate intraoperative and physiological variables to improve risk stratification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more similar...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

