Inter-Center Radiation Variability in CO2-Guided EVAR: Lessons From the Zero Iodine Contrast Multicenter Prospective
Emiliano Chisci1, Emanuele Ferrero2, Michele Antonello3
1Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, USL Toscana Centro, "San Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Carbon dioxide (CO2)-guided endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) shows dose variability, but modern systems with optimized protocols achieve radiation levels comparable to iodinated contrast media (ICM). This study sets new benchmarks for CO2-guided EVAR radiation safety.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Radiation Safety
Background:
- Current diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for EVAR using iodinated contrast media (ICM) range from 100 to 200 Gy·cm².
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography, a negative contrast agent, may increase radiation exposure during EVAR.
- This study evaluates radiation dose in CO2-guided EVAR using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with an automated injector.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess radiation dose metrics (DAP and Kar) during CO2-guided EVAR across multiple centers.
- To identify factors influencing radiation dose, including angiographic system generation and protocols.
- To evaluate optimization strategies for reducing radiation exposure in CO2-guided EVAR.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter, observational study of dosimetry during CO2-guided EVAR.
- Recorded dose-area product (DAP) and reference air kerma (Kar) as primary endpoints.
- Investigated optimization strategies at a single site to reduce patient and operator radiation exposure.
Main Results:
- 293 patients across 10 centers showed median DAP of 189 Gy·cm² (IQR 107-285) and Kar of 626.5 mGy (IQR 145.5-1373.5).
- Significant inter-center variability in radiation dose was observed (p<0.001).
- Newer angiographic systems (median DAP 90 Gy·cm²) showed lower dose than older systems (191 Gy·cm²; p<0.001).
- Optimization strategies, including low-dose protocols and synchronized CO2-DSA, achieved a 56% overall reduction in median DAP to 28.5 Gy·cm².
Conclusions:
- CO2-guided EVAR radiation dose varies significantly based on equipment and protocols.
- Modern systems with optimized low-dose protocols and CO2-DSA synchronization yield radiation doses comparable to ICM-based EVAR.
- This study establishes radiation dose benchmarks for CO2-guided EVAR, confirming its safety and efficacy.
More Related Videos
09:32Time-Resolved, Dynamic Computed Tomography Angiography for Characterization of Aortic Endoleaks and Treatment Guidance via 2D-3D Fusion-Imaging
Published on: December 9, 2021
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
