Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Update on The Evidence-Based Assessment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Youth
Nóra Bunford1,2, Domonkos Koppány1, Kristóf Ágrez1,2
1Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology Research Group, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences.
This review evaluates Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) assessment tools, finding some measures reliable but highlighting a lack of rigorous research and inconsistent reporting. Further revisions are needed for reproducible science.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Psychological Assessment
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Background:
- Reliability and validity of ADHD assessment tools are crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment.
- Previous comprehensive reviews highlighted limitations in existing ADHD measures.
- An updated evaluation is needed to reflect current research and identify reliable assessment tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an updated evaluation of the reliability and validity of ADHD assessment measures.
- To assess the quality of ADHD assessment tools using a revised rubric.
- To identify strengths and weaknesses of various ADHD assessment methods.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of ADHD assessment measures published since the last comprehensive review.
- Utilized an empirical rationale for measure selection.
- Applied a revised version of the Rubric for Evaluating Norms, Validity, and Utility.
Main Results:
- ADHD-RS, Conners, SNAP, and Vanderbilt scales showed adequate descriptive information, reliability, and validity, with excellent treatment sensitivity.
- Clinical interviews (DISC, K-SADS) showed adequate construct validity, but information was insufficient for most.
- Neuropsychological tests generally had adequate psychometric properties, but discriminative validity and treatment sensitivity varied.
- Impairment rating scales showed mixed findings, with IRS demonstrating broader reliability and validity.
- Significant gaps exist in reporting interrater/retest reliability, content validity, and generalization.
- Inconsistent reporting of demographic and medication status was noted.
- No improvement in reporting design constraints was observed over the past decade.
Conclusions:
- Several ADHD assessment measures demonstrate adequate reliability and validity.
- There is a critical need for more rigorous empirical research on ADHD assessment tools.
- Further revisions to evaluation rubrics are necessary to advance reproducible scientific practices in ADHD research.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Conduct Disorder
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...