Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 23, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Evolving landscape of targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials
Alice Rossi1, Irene Braña2, Maria Vieito2
1Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Background:
Early phase clinical trials assessing targeted therapies have historically been associated with a wide range of efficacy rates and toxicities. Recently, the implementation of molecular prescreening programs and the development of more selective and potent targeted agents may associate with improved outcomes.
Patients And Methods:
We analyzed patient-level data from the 360 RESISTANCE (360R), a prospective study evaluating the outcomes of patients treated with targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials at Vall d´Hebron University Hospital. Objective response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint. We also aimed to evaluate trends in efficacy and toxicity of targeted therapies over time by analyzing the ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) in early phase clinical trial (PFS2) over PFS on prior therapy (PFS1).
Results:
Between 2015 and 2023, 261 patients were enrolled in the 360R encompassing 74 different clinical trials, of which, 156 patients (59.8%) were treated with molecularly matched targeted therapies and 105 (40.2%) treated with non-matched targeted therapies. The most frequent targets were FGFR signaling pathway (14.2%), epigenetic pathways (13.8%), Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway (12.3%), SHP2 (7.7%) and ErbB family pathway (6.5%). ORR increased over time: 6.4% (in 2015-2016), 14.3% (in 2017-2018), 18.2% (in 2019-2020) and 25.4% (in 2021-2023). PFS2/PFS1 ratio was ≥ 1.3 in 36.2% for all targeted therapies (40.6% in matched vs 29.4% in non-matched). The rate of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events remained stable. No treatment-related deaths were observed.
Conclusions:
Encouraging trends for improved efficacy were observed for targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials, especially for molecularly matched agents. These findings highlight the potential value of molecular prescreening programs matching patients to clinical trials assessing targeted therapies.
Insights
Molecularly matched targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials show improved efficacy and stable toxicity. Molecular prescreening programs enhance patient outcomes in targeted cancer therapy research.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Genomics
Background:
- Early phase clinical trials for targeted therapies historically show variable efficacy and toxicity.
- Molecular prescreening and development of selective agents may improve patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity trends of targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials.
- To assess the impact of molecularly matched versus non-matched targeted therapies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of patient-level data from the 360 RESISTANCE (360R) prospective study.
- Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR).
- Secondary endpoint: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) ratio (PFS2/PFS1) to evaluate efficacy trends over time.
Main Results:
- 261 patients were enrolled between 2015-2023 across 74 trials.
- Objective Response Rate (ORR) increased significantly over time, reaching 25.4% in 2021-2023.
- Molecularly matched targeted therapies showed a higher PFS2/PFS1 ratio (40.6%) compared to non-matched (29.4%).
- Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events remained stable, with no treatment-related deaths.
Conclusions:
- Targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials demonstrate encouraging efficacy trends, particularly when molecularly matched.
- Molecular prescreening programs are valuable for matching patients to appropriate targeted therapy clinical trials.
- These findings support the integration of molecular profiling in precision oncology trial design.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Site-Targeted

